Communism -- Hungary; Hungary -- History -- Revolution, 1918-1919 -- Personal narratives; Tormay, Cécile, 1876-1937 -- Diaries
The heckler swore. One man lit a cigarette and several cried, “Shut up,”
but Comrade Soma Vass went on talking. Nobody paid any attention to him,
the people chatting among themselves. “He will grow gallows ... a
nursery of them ... grow them, shape them.... Well, at least he has a
programme of a sort.”
And thus, after all the destruction, Béla Kun’s spokesman has nailed
down the only creative policy of Hungary’s Socialist production. They
are going to grow gallows.
* * * * *
_July 14th–20th._
Béla Kun has sent a note to Clemenceau asking for the evacuation of the
Tisza as promised in compensation for the abandoned offensive against
the Czechs; he received the following answer:
“Béla Kun, Budapest. In answer to your wireless which you sent on the
11th inst. to the President, the Peace Conference declares that it
cannot negotiate with you as long as you fail to observe the conditions
of the armistice.”
For a time I stared at the text of the telegram. How much blood, shame
and suffering would have been spared to humanity if the victorious
powers, instead of sending propositions through General Smuts to Béla
Kun’s band of murderers and dangling before the Soviet’s eyes the
possibility of its admission to the Peace Conference, had sent from the
start a reply to this effect. Let the spilt blood and the inhuman
tortures fall on the heads of those who wanted to bargain when
conscience, honour and charity forbade any bargaining.
It is all clear now. The victorious Great Powers did not enter into
negotiations with Béla Kun because they were pressed to do so by their
own Proletariat, for that pressure would still exist, but simply because
he made light of the integrity of the country to which he had not the
slightest title. This shame can never be wiped out. The frigid, tardy
note cannot restore the lowered dignity of the victorious States.
Béla Kun answered, his reply couched in provocative, ironical terms. He
made little attempt to disguise the doubt he had of Clemenceau’s
veracity and derided his impotence to impose his will on the Rumanians
and Czechs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account