It is probably correct to state that the material progress of any
people has always been concurrent with the development of the
art of civil-engineering, and, hence, that the practice of civil
engineering began among the people who made the earliest progress in
civilization, to whom “the art of directing the Great Sources of Power
in Nature for the use and convenience of man” became an early and
imperative necessity. Indeed that conclusion is confirmed by the most
ancient ruins of what may be termed public works that archæological
investigations have revealed to us, among which are those to be found
in the Chaldean region, in India, and in Egypt. Obviously, anything
like a detailed account of the structural and other works of such
ancient character must be lacking, as some of them were built before
even the beginnings of history. Our only data, therefore, are the
remains of such works, and unfortunately they have too frequently been
subject to the destructive operations of both man and nature.
=2. Hydraulic Works of Chaldea and Egypt.=—It is absolutely certain
that the populous centres of prehistoric times could not have existed
nor have been served with those means of communication imperatively
necessary to their welfare without the practice of the art of
engineering, under whatever name they may have applied to it. It is
known beyond any doubt that the anciently populous and prosperous
country at the head of the Persian Gulf and watered by the Euphrates
and the Tigris was irrigated and served by a most complete system
of canals, and the same observation can be made in reference to the
valley of the Nile. It is not possible at this period of that country’s
history to determine to what extent irrigation was practised or how
extensively the former country was served by water transportation
conducted along artificial channels; but hydraulic works, including
dams and sluices with other regulating appliances designed to bring
waters from the rivers on to the land, were certainly among the
earliest executed for the benefit of the communities inhabiting those
regions. The remains of those works, spread over a large territory
in the vicinity of ancient Babylon, Nippur, and other centres of
population, show beyond the slightest doubt that there existed a
network of water communication throughout what was in those days
a country rich in agricultural products and which supported the
operations of a most prosperous commerce. These canals were of ample
dimensions to float boats of no mean size, although much smaller than
those occupied in our larger systems of canal transportation. They
were many miles in length, frequently interlacing among themselves
and intersecting both the Tigris and the Euphrates. The remains of
these canals, some of them still containing water, show that they must
originally have been filled to depths varying from five or six to
fifteen or twenty feet, and that their widths may have been twenty-five
or thirty feet or more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account