=16. Roman Bricks and Masonry.=—The Romans produced bricks both by
sun-baking and by burning, although there are now remaining apparently
no specimens of the former in Rome. Bricks were used very largely for
facing purposes, such as a veneer for concrete work. The failure to
recognize this fact has led some investigators and writers into error.
As matter of fact bricks were used as a covering for concrete work, the
latter performing all the structural functions.
The old Roman aqueducts were frequently lined with concrete, made of a
mixture of pozzuolana, lime, and crushed (pounded) bricks or potsherds.
The same material was also used for floors under the fine mortar in
which the mosaics were imbedded.
Marble came into use in Rome about 100 B.C., from Luna, near modern
Carrara, Mt. Hymettus, and Mt. Pentelicus, near Athens and the Isle of
Paros, nearly all being for sculpture purposes. Colored and structural
marbles were brought from quarries in various parts of Italy, Greece,
Phrygia, Egypt, near Thebes (oriental alabaster or “onyx”), Arabia, and
near Damascus.
From the latter part of the first century B.C. the hard building-stones
like granites and basalts were brought to Rome in large quantities.
Most of the granites came from Philæ on the Nile. The basalts came both
from Lacedæmonia and Egypt. Both emery (from the island of Naxos in the
Ægean Sea) and diamond-dust drills were used in quarrying or working
these stones. Ships among the largest, if not the largest, of those
days, were built to transport obelisks and other large monoliths.
The quality of ancient Roman mortar varies considerably as it is now
found. That of the first and second centuries is remarkably hard, and
made with red pozzuolana. In the third century it began to be inferior
in quality, brown pozzuolana sometimes being used. The reason for this
difference in quality cannot be confidently assigned. The deterioration
noted in the third century work may be due to the introduction of bad
materials, or to the wrong manipulation of material intrinsically good,
or it is not unlikely the deterioration is due to a combination of
these two influences. The use of mortar indicates a class of early
construction; it is found in the Servian wall on the Aventine, of date
700 B.C., or possibly earlier.
[Illustration: Dovetail Wooden Tenon. Wooden Dowel. FIG. 8.]
Under the empire (27 B.C. to A.D. 475) large blocks of tufa, limestone
(travertine), or marble were set with very close joints, with either
no mortar or, if any, as thin as paper; end, top, and bottom clamps of
iron were used to bond such stones together. It was also customary, in
laying such large, nicely finished blocks of stone without mortar, to
use double dovetailed wooden ties, or, as in the case of columns, a
continuous central dowel of wood, as shown in the figures.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account