Ancient calendars and constellationsPlunket, Emmeline M. (Emmeline Mary)
History
Ancient calendars and constellations
Plunket, Emmeline M. (Emmeline Mary)
Astronomy, Ancient; Calendar; Constellations
[18] The initial point of the Hindu Zodiac (see Plate III.) is about
9½ degrees to the west of the boundary line of the constellation
Aries, as it is drawn on our celestial globes. One foot of Aries,
however, extends beyond the boundary line, and touches a line drawn
through the initial point of the Hindu Zodiac and the poles of the
ecliptic. At page 132, the question of the date of the fixation of
this initial point is discussed, and a high antiquity for it is
claimed. There are many considerations which may lead us to the
opinion that not only in India, but amongst the ancients generally,
the first degree of the constellation coincided with the Hindu
initial point, and not with the boundary line of the constellation,
as it is now drawn. Greek and Latin authors, writing in the first
century B.C., speak of the solstitial and equinoctial colures, as
being “at the eighth degree of the Zodiac,” and these statements,
which have caused modern commentators much perplexity (see _Handbuch
der Klassischen Alterthumswissenschaft_; _Zeitrechnung der Griechen
und Römer_, Unger), may be easily explained, if we realize that they,
in all likelihood, counted the degrees of the Zodiac from the same
initial point as that in use amongst Hindu astronomers, which in the
first century B.C. was eight degrees to the west of the equinoctial
point.
Dupuis, writing at nearly the same date as Bailly, about a hundred
years ago, and in conflict with him on many points relating to the
Zodiac, was also struck by the choice of this same inconspicuous
point in the great circle of the ecliptic, not only by the Brahmins
of India, but also by other ancient nations. He further explains that
the difference in the choice of initial point by the Chinese, and by
the other nations, is only an apparent, and not a real difference. On
the wonderful agreement shown by so many nations, in their choice of
the stars by which they marked the beginning of their Zodiacs, Dupuis
relied to support his views concerning the unity of the astronomical
and religious myths of all nations.
At the end of his work, _Mémoire Explicatif du Zodiaque_, Dupuis gives
in a diagram several Zodiacs in concentric circles; some divided into
twelve, some into twenty-seven or twenty-eight parts. He represents
the colures by a cross which quarters these concentric Zodiacs, and
speaking of the twenty-seven- and twenty-eight-fold divisions, he
observes as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account