Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Classical literature -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Ancient
Epic and tragedy, comedy also and the [dramatic[13]] art of
the dithyramb, and most of the art of the flute and of the
lyre are all, taken together, imitations. They differ one from
another in three respects: in the means of imitation, in the
object, or in the mode [i.e., all are essentially imitation;
in imitation they are generally alike, and in imitation they
are specifically different].
For as there are those who by colors and outlines imitate
various objects in their portrayals, whether by art or by
practise, and others who imitate through the voice, so also
in the arts mentioned above. All [these] make their imitation
by rhythm, by language, and by music, whether singly or in
combination. Thus only rhythm and music are used in the art
of the flute, of the lyre, and in such other arts, similar in
capacity, as that of the pipes. Rhythm itself, without music,
[suffices for] the art of the dancers; for by ordered rhythms
they imitate both character and emotion and action [i.e.,
dancing compasses the whole scope of representation]. Words
alone, whether prose or verse of whatever kind, are used by an
art which is to this day without a name. We have no common name
for the mime of Sophron or Xenarchus and the Socratic dialogue.
Nor should we have one if the imitation were in trimeters or
elegiacs or some other kind of verse.... [For it is not verse,
Aristotle goes on to say, that makes poetry, but imitation.]
So much for differentiation. There are some arts that use all
the means mentioned above, i.e., rhythm, music, and verse,
e.g., dithyrambic and nomic poetry and also both tragedy and
comedy; but they differ in that the first two use all the means
in combination, whereas the latter use now one, now another.
Therefore I differentiate these arts by their respective means
of imitation.
To proceed surely from this opening chapter, it is evidently necessary to
grasp what Aristotle means first by imitation, secondly by that nameless
art which uses only words, thirdly by classifying the art of poetry with
that of music and that of the dance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account