Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Classical literature -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Ancient
By imitation Aristotle means just what the word means most simply and
usually, but also and more largely the following of the ways of human
nature, the representation or the suggestion of men’s characters,
emotions, and actions.[14] At its lowest, imitation is mimicry; at
its highest, creation. The latter is often implied in the Greek word
_poetic_.[15] Poetic is one of the fine arts. By whatever means, in
whatever forms, it is a direct showing of life, as distinct from any
account of life through experiment or reasoning. The artist enhances
our impressions of life by the suggestions of music or of story, the
representations of dance or of drama. All these ways are called by
Aristotle imitation because they follow the movements of human life. It
is noteworthy that he presents imitation primarily as a constructive or
progressive principle. The more obvious imitation achieved by a single
phrase, a single melody, or a single dance-movement is reserved for later
discussion of detail.[16] The poet is a maker, as indeed he was called
by our Elizabethans as well as by the Greeks, in the sense that he is
creative. Poet, poetry, poetic, all are used by Aristotle with this broad
implication of creative composition,[17] of “imitating men in action.”
Secondly, Aristotle specifies as kinds of the poetic art tragedy and
comedy, which belong together as drama, and on the other hand epic, mime,
dialogue, which also belong together, but have no common name. We lack,
he says, a generic name for those forms of poetic art which, however
various, are alike in having for their sole means of imitation words. The
generic name that Aristotle desired to cover all prose and all metrical
compositions in which the imitation is through words alone is still to
seek. Yet that the genus is distinct through many varieties of form is
even clearer to-day than in his time. The imitation of dancing and of
all forms of drama is through representation; the imitation of music
without words is through suggestion. Now so is the imitation of words
without music. True, the words in the latter case carry something besides
imitation; they convey ideas; but in so far as they achieve imitation,
they do so by suggestion, and it is this suggestive imitation that makes
them poetic. What is needed, then, is a term to cover all composition in
words that proceeds by suggestion. Perhaps the nearest term in modern
English is _narrative_. Using narrative widely enough to include, as in
common modern use it often does include, dialogue and description, we
have the term that Aristotle desired. _Story_ would serve if it were
not often used of the plot of a play or of an account in a newspaper.
_Narrative_ usually connotes a distinct method. A distinguishing generic
term is more important to-day than in the time of Aristotle. Modern
authors have developed narrative in directions little explored by the
ancients. We have thus a variety of narrative forms which was quite
unknown to Aristotle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account