Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Classical literature -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Ancient
[Chapter ii differentiates the epic and the tragic art, which
idealize “men in action” by seeking higher types of manhood
and exhibiting men’s aspirations, from the comic art, which
exaggerates human failings. Chapter iii differentiates the
two typical modes of poetic imitation as the narrative and
the dramatic. Chapters iv and v, starting from the common
impulses toward imitation, toward music, and toward rhythm,
summarize the history of tragedy and of comedy. The conclusion
is that tragedy differs from epic not only in proceeding by
representation instead of narrative, but by being focused on a
short period of time, normally twenty-four hours; in a word, by
being intensive. Thus we arrive at the famous analysis of the
essentials and the elements of tragedy.]
A tragedy,[18] then, is an imitation of an action that is (1)
serious and, (2) as to size, complete, (3) in language enhanced
as may be appropriate to each part, (4) in the form of action,
not of narrative, (5) through pity and fear effecting its
catharsis of such emotions.... Every tragedy,[19] therefore,
must have six constituents, according to which we estimate its
quality: plot, character, diction, thought, spectacle, and
music.
The greatest of these is the plan of the actions (the plot);
for tragedy is an imitation not of men, but of action and
life ... and the end [for which we live] is a certain form of
action, not a quality. By their characters men are what they
are; but by their actions they are happy or the reverse. [In a
play] therefore they do not act in order to imitate character;
they include character for the sake of the actions. Hence the
actions and their plot are the end of tragedy; and the end is
greatest of all. Furthermore, without action there may not
be tragedy; without character there may be.... By stringing
together speeches expressive of character and well made as to
diction and thought you will not achieve the tragic function.
Much rather is it achieved by a tragedy which, however
deficient in these, has plot and plan of actions. Besides,
those things by which tragedy moves us most, scenes of reversal
and of discovery, are parts of the plot. A further proof is
that novices in dramaturgy can put a fine point on diction and
characterization before they compose deeds; and it is the same
with nearly all the early dramatists. The principle and, as it
were, the soul of tragedy is plot.
Second is character.... Third[20] is thought, i.e., the
ability to say what is necessary and appropriate, which in
public address is the function of politics and rhetoric....
Characterization is what shows habit of mind.... Thought
appears in formal reasoning.
Fourth is diction, i.e., the expression of meaning in words,
which is essentially the same in verse as in prose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account