Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and MannersFerrero, Guglielmo
History
Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners
Ferrero, Guglielmo
America -- Civilization; Europe -- Civilization; Justice, Administration of -- Rome; Progress
His first move had for its object the elimination of Cicero as
prosecutor. The Roman law, though it allowed anyone to constitute
himself accuser of a citizen who had violated the laws, did not permit
an unlimited number of people to get up and accuse a single individual.
For, in that case, the law would have worked oppressively, cruelly, and
unconscionably. The accusation had to be lodged by a single person;
and if several persons asked to be allowed to accuse an individual, it
was the duty of the authority to choose one of them as the accuser.
Verres accordingly tried to find a rival for Cicero. A certain Quintus
Cecilius Negro, a Roman citizen, but of Sicilian origin and a Hebrew
by religion, who had been Verres’s quæstor in Sicily, appeared before
the Prætor, declaring that he wished to prosecute Verres, and demanding
the privilege over Cicero on the pretext that he had been insulted by
Verres in Sicily. As a matter of fact, there had been a violent quarrel
between them about a certain Agonis, a freedwoman of the temple of
Venus at Eryx, who practised the profession reserved in the ancient
world for the slaves of the temples of Venus.
So a preliminary trial was necessary to decide which should be the
accuser, Cecilius or Cicero, and this trial took place in the early
months of the year 70. Cicero made a powerful speech in which he
clearly insinuated that Cecilius was playing a part with the connivance
of Verres; that the former, if he were chosen to be the accuser,
would conduct the prosecution in the way best calculated to secure
Verres’s acquittal. He added in more precise terms that the case was
of the greatest political importance, inasmuch as it was bound to
prove definitely to the provinces whether there was or was not justice
to be had in Rome; whether the subjects of Rome might expect to find
their rights impartially defended in the courts of the Republic, or
whether—as the enemies of Rome and the adversaries of the dominant
party were repeating on all sides—the aristocracy were nothing but
a corrupt and rapacious association without bowels of mercy for the
victims whom they tortured.
Cicero was successful in this first skirmish. He obtained recognition
from the court as the prosecutor of Verres, and was granted one hundred
and ten days in which to proceed to Sicily to collect the proofs of his
accusation. He started at once.
At Rome, the struggle between the party with the purse and the
Democratic opposition, encouraged by the support of the two
all-powerful Consuls, waxed furious. Pompey and Crassus induced
the Senate to restore to the Tribunes their ancient powers. They
re-established the censorship and by the instrumentality of the two
newly elected Censors, they ejected from the Senate many of the more
contemptible of Sulla’s partisans. Marcus Aurelius Cotta proposed
a reform of the courts which would have removed the latter almost
entirely from the influence of the dominant party.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account