Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and MannersFerrero, Guglielmo
History
Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners
Ferrero, Guglielmo
America -- Civilization; Europe -- Civilization; Justice, Administration of -- Rome; Progress
Naturally, these discussions, these laws, and these proposals served
only to increase the general excitement; and of this excitement Verres
took advantage to identify still further his own cause with that of the
party in power. He placed at the disposal of the party the wealth he
had well or badly earned in his province as well as his influence and
his personality. The party on their side chose as candidates for the
consulship Q. Hortensius, his defending counsel, and Quintus Metellus,
who was a great friend of Verres; for the prætorship, Marcus Metellus,
a brother of Quintus and no less than Quintus a friend of Verres. They
opposed with all their force the law proposed by Cotta, which would
have transformed the courts in a manner most unfavourable to Verres’s
interests. The Democratic party in their turn took the Sicilians’
cause under their protection, to the extent of choosing Cicero, their
illustrious advocate, as candidate for the ædileship.
Thus the elections of the year 70 promised to be bound up in the
trial of Verres. They seemed likely to be the means by which the two
parties would endeavour to influence public opinion in favour of the
prosecution or of the defence. Unfortunately, when Cicero, after an
absence of about two months returned to Rome from Sicily, with abundant
matter in the shape of documents and proofs, he found the situation
of the popular party, and consequently his action against Verres—for
its fate was bound up in that of the party—gravely compromised by a
rupture which had arisen between the two Consuls. There was no love
lost between Pompey and Crassus. Each was jealous of the other. In
putting themselves at the head of the Democratic party, they had been
guided by ambition and political calculations. But they were both too
rich, and had too many ties with, and friendships among, the dominant
party—from which both of them came—to be able to infuse much zeal and
sincerity into their services to the opposition. As a result, each had
ended by attacking the other; and these attacks, after some months of
activity, had paralysed the Democratic party, and restored boldness and
confidence to the Conservative party, which was now resolved to wreck
the law of judicial reform and to obtain Verres’s acquittal, the two
triumphs at which it aimed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account