Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and MannersFerrero, Guglielmo
History
Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners
Ferrero, Guglielmo
America -- Civilization; Europe -- Civilization; Justice, Administration of -- Rome; Progress
When we read the violent speeches which Cicero wrote after the trial,
and which he would have pronounced, if it had continued into its second
phase, in order to sum up and point the moral of the terrible evidence
which had been given against Verres; when we compare these speeches
and the charges which they formulate, annotate, and tabulate with the
lenient and light penalty inflicted, we can, at first blush, only
feel surprise. The historian asks himself whether the whole of this
trial—which is certainly one of the most famous in the history of the
world—was not a sort of comedy played by actors of great skill for the
benefit of an ignorant and ingenuous public. Such a judgment would,
however, be too severe. Cicero was an honourable and upright man, and
defended the cause of his Sicilian clients with sincerity and loyalty.
No, this trial was not simply a judicial episode. It was a political
drama, and, like all political dramas, was overlaid with phenomena
which to a certain extent hide its real nature and essence from the
eyes of posterity as it hid these from those of its contemporaries. It
must not be forgotten that all the actors in this trial, the accused,
the prosecutor, the defending counsel, and the judges, belonged to
the same aristocracy. At a certain moment this aristocracy had found
itself compelled, by intestinal quarrels and by a complex political
situation, to sacrifice, in a trial at law, one of its members in order
to satisfy public opinion, Italy, and the Empire; in order to prove
that it was not true, as a whole party was busy whispering about Rome,
that the Roman governors, provided they belonged to the Conservative
aristocracy, were allowed to do what they liked in the provinces and
that their subjects were abandoned defenceless to their caprices and
their greed. But the particular member of the aristocracy whom it was
found necessary to sacrifice, whether he were or were not so great
a villain as his enemies asserted, had friends, protectors, and
supporters who exerted an influence sufficiently great amongst the
dominant party to admit of too ruthless an attack being made upon him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account