Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and MannersFerrero, Guglielmo
History
Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners
Ferrero, Guglielmo
America -- Civilization; Europe -- Civilization; Justice, Administration of -- Rome; Progress
The first of Hortensius’s anticipations quickly came true. The
law, thus modified, passed without difficulty. At once, several
citizens hastened to indict Clodius of incest. Matters had not gone
far, however, before everyone perceived that Hortensius’s second
anticipation, that the conviction of Clodius was inevitable, would
not be realised so easily. Months had passed; the first impression of
horror made on the public had faded. The Conservative party—the same
that had made such efforts to save Verres—was too deeply committed to
obtaining the conviction of Clodius at whatever cost, for the Popular
party not to take Clodius under its protection, though it did so
covertly and without compromising itself too far. Crassus and Cæsar
in particular, without appearing on the scene, were disposed to do
whatever they could, to help Clodius, and to procure him, if it were
possible, an acquittal, an outcome which in no less a degree than the
conviction of Verres, would have been a rebuff for the party which
Sulla had installed in the government, and which, notwithstanding all
the reverses which it had undergone in recent years, was still so
powerful. Clodius on his side worked with the energy of despair to
escape conviction, which would have shattered his political career
irreparably and forever.
The trial took place at the beginning of May, in the midst of a
curiosity and excitement which may be easily imagined. The two parties
had by now decided to face each other once again, as in Verres’s time,
in the confined arena of a law-court. The judges were chosen by lot,
and the defendant especially availed himself of the right which the
law conceded to both sides, of challenging a certain number of them.
Nobody was surprised at this, as everyone knew that the struggle would
be a fierce one, or rather a hopeless one, for the accused. Indeed,
how could Clodius escape conviction, when his guilt was so manifest?
In declaring his act to be _incestum_, the law had already condemned
him in anticipation. When, however, the jury had been impannelled, and
the trial opened, an unexpected and dramatic incident occurred. Clodius
defended himself by saying that the matrons present at the feast in
honour of the _Bona Dea_ had been deceived. They had mistaken somebody
else for him. On that day he was actually not in Rome, but at Iteramna
(Terni)!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account