Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and MannersFerrero, Guglielmo
History
Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners
Ferrero, Guglielmo
America -- Civilization; Europe -- Civilization; Justice, Administration of -- Rome; Progress
For the rest, the matters which Germanicus and Piso had been sent
to the East to settle were complicated and difficult, and therefore
afforded countless opportunities and pretexts for quarrels. Rome found
herself involved in a grave difficulty in the East. Some years before,
the Parthians, left without a king, had sent to Italy for Vonones, a
son of their old King Phraates, who had been educated in Rome at the
house of Augustus. To have at the head of the Parthian Empire a king
who had been educated on the banks of the Tiber was a stroke of luck
for Rome. The Parthians, however, very soon discovered that Vonones had
become too much Latinised at Rome, and had forgotten too completely the
ideas and customs of his nation. Consequently, they had turned him out
and elected in his stead Artabanus. Vonones had fled to Armenia, and
had succeeded in getting elected King of the Armenians. But Artabanus,
not wishing his predecessor to become king of a vast empire marching
with his own, from which he might retrieve in due course the crown of
the Parthians, had succeeded also by means of various intrigues and
threats in getting Vonones expelled from Armenia.
The difficulty which Tiberius had charged Germanicus and Piso to
study and resolve on the spot was actually this: whether Rome should
or should not give ear to Vonones’s clamour and replace him on the
throne of Armenia. The difficulty was a serious one, as each of the
two opposing courses promised grave dangers. By replacing Vonones
on the throne of Armenia, Rome might implicate herself in serious
quarrels, and perhaps in a war, with the King of the Parthians, who
was opposed to Vonones’s restoration. By not replacing him, Rome
appeared to sacrifice to the hatred of the Parthian King this faithful
client of hers, whose only fault was that he had been educated in
Rome; to be inclined to recognise that a prince who had been too
thoroughly Romanised could not govern an Oriental state,—a confession
which certainly would not encourage the protected sovereigns of Asia,
great and small, to bring themselves too closely into touch with the
affairs, ideas, and customs of the protecting state. In point of
fact, Germanicus and Piso, who were already embittered against each
other by the incidents at Athens, came into open conflict on this
point. Germanicus and his supporters were in favour of sacrificing
Vonones to the resentment of the King of the Parthians and to the
national susceptibilities of the East; while Piso, more loyal to the
authoritative traditions of the old Roman policy, which were faithfully
reflected in his own more cautious judgment, decided to defend Vonones.
Rome must not abandon the cause of this her faithful servant in the
East!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account