Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and MannersFerrero, Guglielmo
History
Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners
Ferrero, Guglielmo
America -- Civilization; Europe -- Civilization; Justice, Administration of -- Rome; Progress
With these impressions and opinions, I arrived from South America in
the America which symbolises in the eyes of the world the practical
spirit. And in this America, to my no small surprise, I found the
opposite policy to this in actual operation, with all the effects
which I imagined must follow it; in particular, the growing difficulty
of making democratic institutions work smoothly, with an electoral body
so swollen, so enormous, and so varied and heterogeneous. I often had
occasion, when speaking or writing in the United States, to remember
that the cosmopolitan electoral body which is the base of the democracy
of the United States recalls that of Rome, where the freedmen—the
immigrants of the time—became citizens, and were inscribed in the
electoral lists, whatever their national origin, and even if they
were all foreigners, barbarians some of them, uncivilised the rest.
Nevertheless, there is between the United States and Ancient Rome one
essential difference; and that is, that in the Roman Republic, the
electoral operations were concentrated in the capital, so that the
number of persons who took part in them, the really active electoral
body, was extremely small; while in the United States, the electors
are numbered by millions, and are scattered over a continent. Do not
most of the difficulties and inconveniences of which I have heard
America complain in connection with its internal politics arise from
the enormous size of the electoral body and from its heterogeneity?
For both of these are unique phenomena in the history of the world, as
until now every democracy has governed small, and often the tiniest
of, states. So this experiment, which America is making, without being
compelled to do so by any historical necessity, is a new and bold
one, the final result of which it is difficult to foretell. As a
matter of fact, the ancient national oligarchies, which governed North
America, for so many years after it had gained its independence, did
not open the doors of the constitution to the immigrant multitudes who
threatened, if admitted, to swamp them. It would have been easy to keep
at least the first Europe-born generation out of politics, because—as
I have already said—the greater number of immigrants arrive in America
without the vaguest idea, much less ambition, of obtaining what, in a
democracy, are the political rights of a citizen, and only want big
salaries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account