As there appears to be some difference of opinion among botanists
as to whether certain trees, now common in our forests, such as elm
and beech, are indigenous to Scotland, my attention was directed at
an early stage of the investigations at Lochlee to the importance
of determining the different kinds of wood used in the structure
of the crannog. Accordingly, I collected specimens of the wood and
other vegetal remains encountered during the excavations, and in due
time forwarded them to Professor Balfour, Edinburgh, who had kindly
agreed to examine and report upon them, but unfortunately, owing
to ill-health, he was unable to do so, and the box containing the
specimens, after lying in Edinburgh for some weeks, was returned
unopened. Ultimately, however, Dr. Bayley Balfour, Professor of Botany
in the University of Glasgow, undertook this task, and it is to him I
am therefore indebted for the following report:--
"I shall send by train to-morrow the box of Lochlee vegetable remains.
I have examined them carefully, and you will find each specimen
numbered, the numbers corresponding with those in the appended list.
There is not so much variety in the wood as I anticipated, and I am
surprised to find neither oak nor fir. The tissue of the wood is
in most cases considerably decomposed, the wood cells, as might be
expected, being most affected. Betwixt alder (_Alnus glutinosa_, L.)
and poplar (_Populus tremula_, L.), the only indigenous species, there
is really very little difference in wood structure, and indeed birch
(_Betula alba_, L.) and hazel (_Corylus Avellana_, L.) are not far
removed, so that that when the texture of the wood is much compressed,
and decomposition has progressed, an identification is somewhat
hazardous, and I have therefore queried my determination in some
cases. No beech occurs amongst the specimens you sent me."
The following is a summary of the detailed list:--
I. _Brushwood, etc._--The various specimens of wood which were selected
from below the log pavement have been classified as belonging to one
or other of the following trees, viz., birch (_Betula alba_), hazel
(_Corylus Avellana_), alder (_Alnus glutinosa_), and willow (_Salix_,
sp.).
II. _Wooden Relics._--One of the implements (Fig. 118), which appeared
to be made of a different kind of wood from any of the rest, has been
identified by Dr. Balfour as elm (_Ulmus montana_, Sm.); and the piece
of board with the carved diagrams (see pages 134, 135) is found to
be ash (_Fraxinus excelsior_, L.). The rest of the relics were not
submitted to Dr. Balfour, as they had so crumbled into dust (except
those made of oak, all of which were easily recognised) that their
identification appeared impossible.
III. Among the remaining vegetal remains collected from the débris
above the log pavement, Dr. Balfour has identified the following
species:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account