And the Kaiser abdicates: The German Revolution November 1918-August 1919Bouton, S. Miles (Stephen Miles)
History
And the Kaiser abdicates: The German Revolution November 1918-August 1919
Bouton, S. Miles (Stephen Miles)
Germany -- History -- Revolution, 1918; Germany -- Politics and government
The German revolution, however, alone among the great revolutions of the
world, was, as has already been pointed out, both in its origins and
execution, proletarian and Socialistic. The _bourgeoisie_ had no part in
it and no participation in the revolutionary government. Any attempt to
develop the revolution further by overthrowing or opposing the first
revolutionary government could therefore serve only factional and not
class interests. Factional clashes were, of course, inevitable. The
members of the Paris Commune split into four distinct factions,
Jacobins, Blanquists, Proudhonists and a small group of Marxist
Internationalists. But these, bitterly as they attacked each other's
methods and views, nevertheless presented at all times a united front
against the _bourgeoisie_, whereas the German Independent Socialists,
from whom better things might have been expected, almost from the
beginning played into the hands of the Spartacans, from whom nothing
good could have been expected, and thus seriously weakened the
government and eventually made a violent second phase of the revolution
unavoidable.
If it be admitted that Socialist government was the proper form of
government for Germany at this time, it is clear that the Independent
Socialists had a very real mission. This was well expressed in the first
month of the revolution in a pamphlet by Kautsky, in which he wrote:
"The extremes (Majority Socialists and Spartacans) can best be
described thus: the one side (Majority) has not yet completely
freed itself from _bourgeois_ habits of thought and still has
much confidence in the _bourgeois_ world, whose inner strength
it overestimates. The other side (Spartacans) totally lacks all
comprehension of the _bourgeois_ world and regards it as a
collection of scoundrels. It despises the mental and economic
accomplishments of the _bourgeoisie_ and believes that the
proletarians, without any special knowledge or any kind of
training, are able to take over immediately all political and
economic functions formerly exercised by the _bourgeois_
authorities.
"Between these two extremes we find those (the Independents) who
have studied the _bourgeois_ world and comprehend it, who regard
it objectively and critically, but who know how properly to
value its accomplishments and realize the difficulties of
replacing it with a better system. This Marxist center must, on
the one hand, spur the timorous on and awaken the blindly
confiding, and on the other, put a check upon the blind
impetuosity of the ignorant and thoughtless. It has the double
task of driving and applying the brakes.
"These are the three tendencies that contend with each other
within the ranks of the proletariat."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account