Animal intelligence: Experimental studiesThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
Animal intelligence: Experimental studies
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Animal intelligence; Psychology, Comparative
climb up just as inevitably when I said, “My name is Thorndike,” or
“To-day is Tuesday.” So cats would claw at the loop or button when the
door was open. So cats would paw at the place where a loop had been,
though none was there. The reaction is not to a well-discriminated
object, but to a vague situation, and any element of the situation may
arouse the reaction. The whole situation in the case of man is speedily
resolved into elements; the particular elements are held in focus, and
the non-essential is systematically kept out of mind. In the animal the
whole situation sets loose the impulse; all of its elements, including
the non-essentials, get yoked with the impulse, and the situation may
be added to or subtracted from without destroying the association,
provided you leave something which will set off the impulse. The animal
does not think one is like the other, nor does it, as is so often said,
mistake one for the other. It does not think _about_ it at all; it just
thinks _it_, and the _it_ is the kind of “pure experience” we have
been describing. In human mental life we have accurate, discriminated
sensations and perceptions, realized as such, and general notions, also
realized as such. Now, what the phenomena in animals which we have been
considering show is that they have neither. Far from showing an advanced
stage of mentality, they show a very primitive and unspecialized stage.
They are to be explained not by the presence of _general_ notions, but by
the absence of notions of _particulars_. The idea that animals react to
a particular and absolutely defined and realized sense-impression, and
that a similar reaction to a sense-impression which varies from the first
proves an association by similarity, is a myth. We shall see later how an
animal does come in certain cases to discriminate, in one sense of the
word, with a great degree of delicacy, but we shall also see then what
must be emphasized now, that naturally the animal’s brain reacts very
coarsely to sense-impressions, and that the animal does not think about
his thoughts at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account