Animal Intelligence: The International Scientific Series, Vol. XLIV.Romanes, George John
Science
Animal Intelligence: The International Scientific Series, Vol. XLIV.
Romanes, George John
Animal behavior; Animal intelligence
Although the systematic experiments of Sir John Lubbock have not tended
to confirm these observations with regard to bees and wasps, we must not
too readily allow his negative results to discredit these positive
observations--more especially as we have seen that his _later_
experiments have fully confirmed the opinion of these previous authors
with respect to ants. His experiments on bees and wasps consisted in
exposing honey in a hidden situation, marking a bee or wasp that came to
it, and observing whether it afterwards brought any companions to share
the booty. He found that although the same insect would return over and
over again, strangers came so rarely that their visits could only be
attributed to accidental and independent discovery. Only if the honey
were in an exposed situation, where the insects could _see_ one another
feeding, would one follow the other to the food.
But we have the more reason not to accept unreservedly the conclusion
to which these experiments in themselves might lead, because the very
able observer F. Müller states an observation of his own which must be
considered as alone sufficient to prove that bees are able to
communicate information to one another:--
Once (he says[51]) I assisted at a curious contest,
which took place between the queen and the other bees
in one of my hives, which throws some light on the
intellectual faculties of these animals. A set of
forty-seven cells have been filled, eight on a newly
completed comb, thirty-five on the following, and four
around the first cell of a new comb. When the queen
had laid eggs in all the cells of the two older combs
she went several times round their circumference (as
she always does, in order to ascertain whether she has
not forgotten any cell), and then prepared to retreat
into the lower part of the breeding-room. But as she
had overlooked the four cells of the new comb, the
workers ran impatiently from this part to the queen,
pushing her, in an odd manner, with their heads, as
they did also other workers they met with. In
consequence the queen began again to go around on the
two older combs; but as she did not find any cell
wanting an egg she tried to descend, but everywhere
she was pushed back by the workers. This contest
lasted for a rather long while, till the queen escaped
without having completed her work. Thus the workers
knew how to advise the queen that something was as yet
to be done, but they knew not how to show her _where_
it had to be done.
Again, Mr. Josiah Emery, writing to 'Nature,'[52] with reference to Sir
John Lubbock's experiments, says that the faculty of communication which
bees possess is so well and generally known to the 'bee-hunters' of
America, that the recognised method of finding a bees' nest is to act
upon the faculty in question:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account