Anomalies of the English lawChester, S. Beach (Samuel Beach)
History
Anomalies of the English law
Chester, S. Beach (Samuel Beach)
Law; Law -- Great Britain -- History
One of the most outrageous libels in recent years, was brought into
court during the Hilary sittings, 1911, when, before the Lord Chief
Justice and a special jury, Edward Frederick Mylius was criminally
indicted for libelling his Majesty the King. The actual printing of
the libel was carried out abroad, in the comparative safety offered
by the French capital. Edward Hilton James was the person chiefly
responsible for the offence. _Liberator_, a name one associates with
Jabez Balfour, the assassination of a Russian Emperor and various other
unsavoury events, was the title chosen for the organ in which the libel
appeared. The _Liberator_ libel on the King was wholly unjustified
from every conceivable standpoint. In the first place, had his Majesty
chosen to go through forty ceremonies of the kind so falsely alleged,
no one of them would have been legal, not even the first. The Royal
Marriages Act, Geo. III.,[16] makes it illegal for any member of
the Sovereign’s family to contract a binding marriage without first
obtaining the consent of the Sovereign, or, failing that, without
giving twelve months’ notice to the Privy Council. Marriage is a purely
legal tie, and if it does not conform with the requirements of the law
it must perforce fail. That is to say, there is no marriage where the
law forbids it. Obviously, had his Majesty chosen to go through any
ceremony of marriage without the sanction of the late Queen Victoria,
or, without giving twelve months’ notice to the Privy Council, such
ceremony would have been just as void as if it had never taken place.
This is merely the way the law views the contingency. In actuality, the
King never went through any form of marriage at all and the libel was a
cruel and a wicked one.
To be a popular or celebrated figure at the present day is to be the
target for every form of foul abuse, criminal concoctions and cruel
lies. Whether a person’s life is blameless or blameworthy, he only
has to reach a certain degree of public attention to be douched with
the vile outpourings of a cesspool, or blinded by the volcanic lava
of jealousy and spite. The individual who yearns for fame had better
first well calculate his power to endure its concomitants! To the
monarch, born to it, there is no choice. He must go ahead as best he
can, sickened with humanity, with his own troublous lot, almost envious
of the stagnant peace of obscurity, with its mediocre associations and
perpetual monotony.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account