Anthology of Russian literature from the earliest period to the present time, volume 1 (of 2) : $b From the tenth century to the close of the eighteenth centuryWiener, Leo
General
Anthology of Russian literature from the earliest period to the present time, volume 1 (of 2) : $b From the tenth century to the close of the eighteenth century
Wiener, Leo
Russia -- Literary collections; Russian literature -- Translations into English
The unity of the Russian land was ever present to the minds of the
writers in the earliest days of the appanages. The bard of the _Word
of Ígor’s Armament_ and Daniel the Palmer made appeals to the whole
country and prayed for all the princes in the twelfth century, and
for upwards of four centuries Moscow has been the centre towards
which the outlying districts have been gravitating. Yet, in spite of
so continuous and well-defined a political tendency, Russia is the
last of the Slavic nations to have evolved a literature worthy of the
name. Bohemia had a brilliant literature of the Western stamp as
early as the thirteenth century; Bulgaria had made a splendid start
three centuries before, under the impulse of the newly introduced
religion; the Servian city of Ragusa, receiving its intellectual leaven
from its Italian vicinage, invested Petrarch and Dante with Servian
citizenship in the fifteenth century, and, shortly after, gloried in an
epic of a Gundulić, and in a whole galaxy of writers; Poland borrowed
its theology from Bohemia, took an active part in the medieval Latin
literature, and boasted a golden age for its native language in the
sixteenth century. Russia produced an accessible literature only in the
second half of the eighteenth century, became known to Western Europe
not earlier than the second quarter of the next, and had not gained
universal recognition until within the last twenty-five years.
In the case of the Western and Southern Slavs, a community of
interests, whether religious or social, has led to an intellectual
intercourse with their neighbours, from whom they have received their
models for imitation or adaptation. Without a favourable geographical
position, or some common bond with the external world, no nation can
have a healthy development, especially in the incipient stage of its
political existence. Blatant Slavophiles of fifty years ago heaped
reproach on the reforms of Peter the Great, on the ground that they
were fashioned upon Western ideals, and that he had retarded the
evolution of Russia according to its inherent Slavic idea. There still
survive men of that persuasion, though a comparative study of Russian
literature long ago demonstrated that every step in advance has been
made by conscious or unconscious borrowings from abroad. If there was
a Russian literature previous to the introduction of Christianity,
it certainly stood in some kind of relation to the literatures of
the neighbours. The few extant treaties with the Greeks for that
period show unmistakable Byzantine influences, and the Russian Code
of Yarosláv, with its purely Norse laws, dates from a time when the
Varyágs had not yet disappeared in the mass of the Slavic majority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account