Anthology of Russian literature from the earliest period to the present time, volume 1 (of 2) : $b From the tenth century to the close of the eighteenth centuryWiener, Leo
General
Anthology of Russian literature from the earliest period to the present time, volume 1 (of 2) : $b From the tenth century to the close of the eighteenth century
Wiener, Leo
Russia -- Literary collections; Russian literature -- Translations into English
Like Lomonósov, Tredyakóvski was of humble origin, his father
having been a priest in the city of Astrakhán; also, like his more
illustrious colleague a few years later, he walked to Moscow and
there entered the School of the Redeemer. He later passed a few years
abroad, where he became acquainted with French literature. Upon his
return to St. Petersburg in 1730, he translated a French book; in this
translation the spoken Russian is for the first time used, free from
Slavic influence. Even before this, Tredyakóvski had written verses in
the syllabic versification, but in 1735 he discovered that the tonic
versification was the only one adapted to the Russian language, and at
once set out to write in that measure. His chief deserts do not lie
in poetry, for his verses show an absolute absence of talent, and he
later became a byword for insipidity. He was the first man to point
out the necessity of using the Russian language for literary purposes,
and to indicate the line in which Russian poetry must develop. By his
enormous industry in translating from foreign languages he became an
important factor in the dissemination of learning. The following ode
is really an imitation of Boileau’s _Sur la prise de Namur_.
ODE ON THE SURRENDER OF DANTZIG
What strange intoxication emboldens my voice to singing? Muses,
dwellers of Parnassus, does not my mind perceive you? I hear your
sweet-sounding strings, your beautiful measure and moods, and a fire
arises in my thoughts. O nations, listen all! Stormy winds, do not
blow: my verse sings of Anna.
Pindar, and after him Flaccus, have in high-flowing diction risen from
the mist to the bright stars, like swift eagles. But if my song to-day
were to equal my sincere and eternal zeal for Anna, Orpheus of Thrace
and Amphion of Thebes would be in ecstasy from it.
Now I strike the dulcet lyre to celebrate the magnificent victory
to the greater downfall of the enemy. Oh, what victorious might has
adorned our joy, for the might of the adversary was equal to ours.
There is no limit to our pure joy that surpasses all example, that has
given balm to our hearts.
Has Neptune himself built the walls, those that stand by the sea? Do
they not resemble the Trojan walls, for they would not let in the
innumerable Russian army, mightily opposing it? Do not all call the
Vistula Skamander? Do they not all regard Stoltzenberg as Mount Ida?
That is not Troy, the mother of fables: there is not one Achilles here;
everyone of the rank and file is in bravery a Hercules. What might is
that that hurls lightning? Is it not Minerva gleaming in her helmet?
’Tis evident from her looks, from her whole appearance, that she is a
goddess: without her ægis she is terrible,--’tis Anna, chief of all
empresses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account