Anthology of Russian literature from the earliest period to the present time, volume 1 (of 2) : $b From the tenth century to the close of the eighteenth centuryWiener, Leo
General
Anthology of Russian literature from the earliest period to the present time, volume 1 (of 2) : $b From the tenth century to the close of the eighteenth century
Wiener, Leo
Russia -- Literary collections; Russian literature -- Translations into English
Derzhávin was born near Kazán, deriving his descent from a Tartar
Murza, and passed his childhood in the east, in the Government of
Orenbúrg. His early education was very scanty. In his fourteenth
year his mother hastened with him to Moscow to enter him for future
service as the son of a nobleman; but, her means being exhausted, she
returned with him to Kazán, where she placed him in the newly opened
Gymnasium. Even here the lack of good teachers precluded his getting
any thorough instruction; his only positive gain was a smattering of
German, which was to help him later in acquainting himself with the
productions of the German Muse. In 1762 he entered the regiment of the
Transfiguration (Preobrazhénski) as a common soldier. Whatever time
he could call his own in the crowded and dingy barracks in which he
passed eight years of his life he devoted to reading and to imitations
of Russian and German verse. In 1772 he was made a commissioned
officer, and was employed to quell the Pugachév rebellion.
It was only in 1779 that Derzhávin began to write in a more
independent strain; one of the best odes of this new period is his
_Monody on the Death of Prince Meshchérski_. But the one that gave
him his greatest reputation was his _Felítsa_, with which began a new
epoch in Russian poetry. Lomonósov, Sumarókov, Tredyakóvski, and a
number of minor poets had flooded Russian literature with lifeless
odes in the French pseudo-classic style, written for all possible
occasions, and generally to order. Just as a reaction was setting in
against them in the minds of the best people, Derzhávin proved by his
_Felítsa_ that an ode could possess other characteristics than those
sanctioned by the French school. In 1782 he occupied a position in
the Senate under the Procurator-General Vyázemski. He had an exalted
opinion of Catherine, whom he had not yet met, and he spoke with full
sincerity of her in his ode. The name _Felítsa_ was suggested to
him by the princess in her moral fable (see p. 276 _et seq._). The
chief interest in the ode for contemporary society lay in the bold
attacks that Derzhávin made on the foibles of the dignitaries. Its
literary value consists in the fact that it was the first attempt
at a purely colloquial tone of playful banter, in a kind of poetic
composition formerly characterised by a stilted language, replete
with Church-Slavic words and biblical allusions. Numerous are the
references made by the poets of the day to the Singer of _Felítsa_
(see p. 358 _et seq._); they all felt that Derzhávin had inaugurated a
new era, that the period which had begun with Lomonósov’s _Capture of
Khotín_ was virtually over.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account