Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1760-1789; Satire; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
In a word, Sir, the period is arrived, when it is no longer a question
who is to be Minister, who are to compose a party, or who have been to
blame. Such discussions will not probably obtain conviction on either
side—The day has passed for reflexions on those who have been alledged to
have given confidence to Insurgency, or on those who have been said to
have provoked it. The object of your consideration is now⸺the salvation
of your Country.
For myself, Sir, I shall no longer desire to remain in my own situation,
than his Majesty, and this House, think I can be useful in it. If any one
Man will take it from me, He will relieve me from the most anxious tasks
that any Minister probably ever experienced: But, till then, Sir, I look
to the support of this house, and to that of all good Men in defending
and maintaining the glory and honour of Great Britain.
[Sidenote: Col. B[a]rré.]
Col. _B[a]rré_ began with recounting his predictions.—I foretold in the
outset of the American contest, that your obstinacy would establish
independance of the colonies. My first prophecy was, that France would
join them—was I wrong?—I will boldly hazard one prediction more—I say,
Spain sooner or later will join both⸺such are the allies of America.—Who
are your’s? The Onandagas, the Tuscaroras, and the Choctaws! These are
your copper coloured allies, that fix a stain on the name of Britain;
and disgrace this country even in victory, as well as defeat—I knew of
these alliances, and their barbarities, so early as the 8th of June
last. I have a letter from a friend of mine at Poughkeepsie, of that
date;—the Indians, headed by Col. B[u]tl[e]r, began their rapine in
_Cherry Valley_; parties of _Indians and Tories_ (so my friend couples
those blood-hounds of desolation) butchered the innocent inhabitants of
_Sacandago_, and spread ruin and carnage through _Minisink_—I am sure,
Col. B[u]tl[e]r, (who is indeed as gallant and amiable an Officer as
ever I knew, and I know him well) never would have embrued his hands in
innocent blood, but that he knew he must sacrifice his feelings to the
speculative, I do not say practical, violence, of the American Secretary.
Gen. C[a]rlt[o]n lost the Noble Lord’s favour by his abhorrence of
the tomahawk and the scalping knife:—have not we tried those satanic
instruments of death too long? Is the whole of Miss _Macreas_ race to be
sacrificed? Not one innocent babe left unbutchered to lisp out the tale
of that devoted, that unhappy family? Of whom are we now to enquire for
any official documents of your war? I see no Secretary of War in this
house? Does the American Secretary monopolize and consolidate all warlike
business? I hope not.⸺
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account