16 (return) [ This [GREEK], or Place of Descent, is the proper rendering
of the Armenian name of this very city. It is called in Ptolemy Naxuana,
and by Moses Chorenensis, the Armenian historian, Idsheuan; but at the
place itself Nachidsheuan, which signifies The first place of descent,
and is a lasting monument of the preservation of Noah in the ark, upon
the top of that mountain, at whose foot it was built, as the first city
or town after the flood. See Antiq. B. XX. ch. 2. sect. 3; and Moses
Chorenensis, who also says elsewhere, that another town was related by
tradition to have been called Seron, or, The Place of Dispersion, on
account of the dispersion of Xisuthrus's or Noah's sons, from thence
first made. Whether any remains of this ark be still preserved, as the
people of the country suppose, I cannot certainly tell. Mons. Tournefort
had, not very long since, a mind to see the place himself, but met with
too great dangers and difficulties to venture through them.]
17 (return) [ One observation ought not here to be neglected, with
regard to that Ethiopic war which Moses, as general of the Egyptians,
put an end to, Antiq. B. II. ch. 10., and about which our late writers
seem very much unconcerned; viz. that it was a war of that consequence,
as to occasion the removal or destruction of six or seven nations of the
posterity of Mitzraim, with their cities; which Josephus would not have
said, if he had not had ancient records to justify those his assertions,
though those records be now all lost.]
18 (return) [ That the Jews were called Hebrews from this their
progenitor Heber, our author Josephus here rightly affirms; and not from
Abram the Hebrew, or passenger over Euphrates, as many of the moderns
suppose. Shem is also called the father of all the children of Heber, or
of all the Hebrews, in a history long before Abram passed over
Euphrates, Genesis 10:21, though it must be confessed that, Genesis
14:13, where the original says they told Abram the Hebrew, the
Septuagint renders it the passenger, [GREEK]: but this is spoken only of
Abram himself, who had then lately passed over Euphrates, and is another
signification of the Hebrew word, taken as an appellative, and not as a
proper name.]
19 (return) [ It is worth noting here, that God required no other
sacrifices under the law of Moses, than what were taken from these five
kinds of animals which he here required of Abram. Nor did the Jews feed
upon any other domestic animals than the three here named, as Reland
observes on Antiq. B. IV. ch. 4. sect. 4.]
20 (return) [ As to this affliction of Abram's posterity for 400 years,
see Antiq. B. II. ch. 9. sect. 1.]
21 (return) [ These sons-in-law to Lot, as they are called, Genesis
19:12-14, might be so styled, because they were betrothed to Lot's
daughters, though not yet married to them. See the note on Antiq. B.
XIV. ch. 13. sect. 1.]
22 (return) [ Of the War, B. IV. ch. 8. sect. 4.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account