Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of ReproductionDavenport, John
Philosophy
Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of Reproduction
Davenport, John
Phallicism; Sex; Sex customs -- France -- History -- 17th century
are the main of the effect, our fancy being so far seduced as to believe
that so strange and uncouth formalities must of necessity proceed from
some abstruse science. Their inanity gives them reverence and weight.
However, certain it is that my figures proved themselves more _Veneran_
than _Solar_, and the fair bride had no reason to complain."
Upon a due consideration of this singular superstition, it must be
obvious to any person of sense that these pretended ligatures are, in
fact, the consequence of an enfeebled constitution, weak intellects, and
sometimes of an ardent imagination, an over-excited desire which carries
the vitality to the head, and diverts it from its principal direction.
Do away with these circumstances and imagine a man in full health, and
gifted with a young and vigorous constitution, alike incapable of
allowing himself to be acted upon by vain terrors, and of permitting his
passions an uncontrolable course; and all the charms and incantation of
these redoubted point-tiers would immediately cease. Who, for instance,
could pretend to point-tie that hero of ancient Greece so famous for his
twelve labours, of which by far the most brilliant was the transforming,
in the course of one night, fifty young virgins into as many women![67]
The most singular circumstance, however, connected with impotency is,
that for a long time there existed exclusively in France a particular
kind of proof called--The Judicial Congress. In the old jurisprudence of
that country but little value was attached to moral proofs; all was made
to depend upon material ones, which were made by witnesses. The whole
enquiry after truth was made to depend upon the establishment of the
fact, and, too frequently, the administrators of the law were not
over-scrupulous as to the nature of the testimony by which it was to be
proved. Provided there were such testimony, no matter of whatever kind,
no matter how contradictory to common sense, justice pronounced itself
satisfied, for, relying upon this testimony it was enabled to pronounce
its decision, and this was all it required. Hence all those personal
examinations of litigants, so often practised formerly, and hence the
judge, whatever might be the nature of the suit or complaint, ordered a
report to be made by parties chosen to that effect, and who were called
_experts_ or examiners. This mode of procedure was employed in cases in
which a woman applied for a divorce from her husband on the ground of
impotency: hence arose the _Congrés_, in which the justice of the
application was to be proved in the presence of examiners appointed to
give in a report upon the case to the court. "Ce qui est encore plus
honteux," says a writer of the 17th century, "c'est qu'un quelques
procés, les hommes ont visité la femme, et au contraire, les femmes ont
été admises à visiter l'homme, qui a été cause d'une grande irrison et
moquerie, que telles procédures ont servi de contes joyeux et plaisans
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account