Apollonius : $b or, The present and future of psychical researchBennett, E. N. (Ernest Nathaniel), Sir
Science
Apollonius : $b or, The present and future of psychical research
Bennett, E. N. (Ernest Nathaniel), Sir
Parapsychology
Can we go further, and suggest that some of the baffling phenomena
of heredity and instinct may ultimately find their origin in the
telepathic transference of thought? We accept the word ‘instinct’ as
an adequate explanation of the habits of sentient creatures, but it
explains nothing. Every manifestation of instinct is obviously due to
volition, however rudimentary――is, in other words, a mental as distinct
(so far as such distinction goes) from a physical phenomenon. It is
difficult to trace an “instinctive” movement to material spermatozoa
or germ-cells. “The burnt child dreads the fire” as the result of
its own experience, but no experience taught the baby how to use its
lips at its first meal, any more than it taught the chicken how to
escape from the eggshell. The “collective experience of the race”, the
alleged source of these phenomena, may sooner or later be recognized as
the telepathic transference from the mind of the parents of concepts
derived from the previous telepathy of successive generations. It
may appear at first sight fantastic to suggest that the mechanically
exact habits of a mother-wasp may be the result of mental telepathy,
but after all this seems a better _vera causa_ than the wasp’s-egg, a
minute fraction of matter which can explain nothing in the realms of
thought or of volition.
Charcot’s telepathic suggestion of a hot iron by the application
of a wooden ruler elicited a cry of agony, and produced a blister
filled with lymph on the percipient’s arm; other experiments at the
Salpêtriêre and elsewhere raised weals and other stigmata on human
bodies. Can it be that this same mysterious and powerful force may come
to be accepted as at any rate a partial solution of the vexed question
of heredity? A baby is born with marked physical characteristics of
its father or mother. During its prenatal existence you have two
main factors: the minds of the parents on the one side, on the other
the mind of the unborn child. The future of the little being lying
under her heart forms the constant thought of the expectant mother.
She thinks of it as reproducing certain characteristics of herself
or of the husband she loves; the husband applies his thoughts in the
same direction: and such concentrated suggestion, consciously or
unconsciously conveyed, may serve to shape the child’s body as well as
its mind, in accordance with the maternal or paternal hopes and desires.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account