[381] Xenophon’s expression (ιατροὺς κατέστησαν ὀκτω) has been
supposed by some commentators to indicate that eight soldiers,
perhaps previously experienced to some extent in tending the
wounded, were selected and improvised into medical officers,
rather than that eight were chosen out of a greater number of
medical attendants present with the army. But, in all
probability, there were present among the ten thousand Greeks
more than eight men who professed the imperfect medical
knowledge pertaining to the surgeons of that day. In a later
part of the _Anabasis_ (v. 8), Xenophon, in defending himself
against accusations of alleged severity on his part, in the
course of the retreat, to some of the soldiers under his
command, argues for its necessity on the principle that
“physicians also use incisions and caustics for the good of
their patients.” He owns to having urged some, when themselves
unwilling, to continue their march towards the shores of the
Black Sea, through the cold and snows of Armenia, “because,”
says he, “sitting down and rest made the blood to congeal, and
the toes to rot off, which was the case of a great many,”—a
result that lately happened only too frequently to the soldiers
of our own armies on the opposite or Crimean shores of the
Euxine.
[382] _De Rebus Gestis Alexandri Magni_, lib. ix. cap. 18. In
lib. iv. cap. 25, an account is given of the extraction of an
arrow from the king’s shoulder, by the surgeon Philip of
Acarnania, who had previously cured Alexander of the attack of
fever which followed on his bathing, when overheated, in the
cold waters of the Cydnus. Curtius speaks (iii. 13) of Philip
as one “inter nobiles medicos,” who were present with the army.
When describing the well-known incident of the fever draught
given by this physician Philip to Alexander, Arrian speaks of
him, not as a medical attendant upon the king, but as one “in
whose extraordinary skill in physic Alexander had great
confidence, because of his success in the camp,” or in
attending upon other members of the army.—(Lib. ii. cap. 4.)
Alexander himself affected some knowledge of medicine. At
least, when Craterus was invalided, and Pausanias, the
physician in attendance upon him, proposed to give him a dose
of hellebore, Alexander (as we are informed by Plutarch) wrote
a letter to Pausanias, expressing his great anxiety about the
case, and desiring him to be cautious in the use of this
medicine. In Alexander’s own chest-wound, as detailed in the
text above, the head of the arrow possibly did not enter the
cavity of the thorax, as its point was, according to Plutarch’s
account, fixed in the bone (the scapula or a rib?). When Julius
Cæsar fell under the daggers of his assassins, out of the
twenty-three wounds which he received, there was none that was
mortal, in the opinion of the surgeon Antistisius, except the
second, a penetrating wound of the breast.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account