[492] See Duchelais’ _Observations_, p. 75; Tochon’s
_Dissertation_, pp. 26 and 64; Maffer’s _Museum Veronense_, p.
135; Johanneau in _Melanges d’Archeologie_, p. 177; for
accounts of stamps inscribed with the legend _Diamysus ad
Veteres Cicatrices_.
[493] _Medicinalium Collectorum_, lib. xiii. p. 499.
[494] _Tetrabiblos_, Sermo iii. cap. 37, p. 382.
[495] Galen defines Cicatrices and Albugo of the eye as
follows:—“_Cicatrix_ appellatur ubi nigro oculi ex alto ulcere
membranae crassities supervenit, ut color _albior_ apparet.
_Albugo_ nihil a cicatrice differt, nisi quod ex ulcere major
cicatrix simul et crassior in iride nascitur.”—Kühn’s Edit.
vol. xiii. p. 775.
[496] See _Tetrabiblos_, Sermo iii. cap. 40, 37.
[497] _Medicæ Artis Principes._ De Collyriis, cap. 72 and 73,
p. 665.
[498] Dr. Adams’ Translation, vol. i. p. 418.
[499] _De Arta Medica_, lib. ii. cap. vi. p. 175. Perhaps the
medical idea of staining the cicatrices of the eyes was
suggested by the circumstance, that the Romans, like the
ancient Egyptians, occasionally had recourse to dyeing or
staining their eyebrows in the decorations of the toilet. On
the substances (_calliblephara_) used for this purpose, see
Pliny, lib. xxiii. cap. 4, and lib. xxxv. cap. 16. Juvenal
alludes to the practice in his Second Satire, v. 93:—
Ille supercilium madida fuligine tactum
Obliqua producit acu, pingitque trementes
Attollens oculos.
[500] See _Medicæ Artis Principes_. De Medicam. p. 280.
[501] In the Minutes of the Society of Antiquaries for 17th
November 1757, the word is copied as DELICATA.
[502] Thus Nicolaus Myrepsus describes the “Collyrium nominatum
_Sol_;” the “Collyrium _Aster_, hoc est stella;” the “Collyrium
dictum _Lumen_.” See his _Opus de Compositione Medicamentorum_,
sect. xxiv. cap. 2, 22, 3, etc. Trallianus describes the
collyrium _Phos_, etc., p. 174. Aetius gives, p. 352, a formula
for the collyrium _Uranium_. See also Oribasius, p. 50. Perhaps
I ought to have stated earlier, that in quoting the works of
Oribasius, Aetius, Myrepsus, Trallianus, Scribonius Largus, and
Marcellus, I always refer, except when it is otherwise
specified, to the writings of these authors as contained in
Stephen’s collated edition of the “_Medicæ Artis Principes post
Hippocratem et Galenum_” (Paris, 1567).
[503] _De Simplic. Medicam._ Kühn’s Edit. vol. xii. p. 152.
[504] See _Gentleman’s Magazine_ for 1778, p. 472.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account