Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
Two later churches by Lassus, Saint-Nicholas at Moulins, built in
collaboration with L.-D.-G. Esmonnot (1807-80) in 1849, and Saint-Pierre
at Dijon of 1853 hardly rival Sainte-Clotilde in size, elaboration, or
even plausibility. Viollet-le-Duc was rather more of an executant
architect than Lassus, even though in this decade and the next most of
his vast energy and very considerable archaeological knowledge went into
the restoration of medieval monuments. At Notre-Dame in Paris the
Chapter House that he designed is a wholly new construction of 1847 not
unworthy of comparison with the best work of Scott in these years. The
block of flats (Plate 56) he built at 28 Rue de Berlin (now de Liège) in
Paris in 1846-8—his first executed building—may better be compared with
the most advanced English secular Gothic of its date, Salvin’s
Peckforton, say, or Butterfield’s St Augustine’s College, Canterbury.
The front is so simple and straightforward in composition that it fits
between more conventional façades with no awkwardness, and the rather
plain detailing has the ‘realism’ that was coming to be admired by this
date in the most advanced English circles.
The Romanesquoid design of Fontaine’s Chapelle-Saint-Ferdinand of 1843
has been mentioned. The use of such forms was in the forties even more
exceptional in France than in England. In 1852 Didron estimated—probably
with some exaggeration—that over two hundred Neo-Gothic churches had
been built or were building in France, a record which compares
statistically, if in no other way, with English church production in
this period. None of them, however, is as impressive to later eyes as
Saint-Paul at Nîmes, which follows with notable success the alternative
Romanesquoid mode of Fontaine’s chapel. C.-A. Questel (1807-88), a pupil
of Blouet and Duban, the architect of this church, had evidently studied
the Romanesque with the care and enthusiasm usually lavished on the
Gothic by his generation, and the result is so great an advance over
Fontaine’s work that the resemblance is merely nominal. Thus might the
Camdenians have hoped to build had they considered the twelfth-century
Romanesque of France as worthy of conscientious emulation as the
fourteenth-century Gothic of England. Saint-Paul is a large cruciform
edifice, rib-vaulted throughout in a proto-Gothic way, and crowned with
a great central lantern. The detail is plausible in its design, neither
too skimpy nor too elaborate, although the execution lacks any real
feeling for medieval craftsmanship in stone. Questel’s church, however,
is as much of an exception as Fontaine’s chapel. No Romanesque Revival
got under way in the forties in France in the way that one did to a
certain extent in Germany, and the few other Romanesquoid churches of
high quality belong to the next period (see Chapter 8).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account