Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
The High Victorian Gothic episode in American architecture balanced
almost precisely the Second Empire episode. Both were disowned, even by
many of their most successful protagonists, by the mid seventies. It was
the Gothic, however, that prepared the way for the more original
developments of the last quarter of the century; as has already been
stated, those who had practised chiefly in the Second Empire mode
continued to take their lead from Paris. Yet there are paradoxes in the
situation which must not be ignored. Richardson, the most creative new
force in the seventies and eighties, continually urged young aspirants
to an architectural career to study at the École des Beaux-Arts as he
had done. Charles F. McKim (1847-1909), Richardson’s first really able
assistant, was Paris-trained; partly because of that training, it was he
who became in the mid eighties the leader of the reaction against the
Richardsonian. Sullivan, the first truly great modern architect not
alone of America but of the whole western world, was also in part
Paris-trained, even though he was always highly critical of the doctrine
of the École and much stimulated by Furness. Finally, it was even more
the later writings of the French Viollet-le-Duc than those of the
English Ruskin that encouraged bold and imaginative thinking about
architecture in America in the seventies and eighties when his
_Entretiens_ became available in translation and were first widely
read.[252]
Were this a history of architectural thought rather than of
architecture—that is of what was actually _built_ in the nineteenth and
twentieth centuries—Viollet-le-Duc would play a much larger part. But
his production,[253] while not negligible, is curiously ambiguous. His
many ‘restorations’ are no contribution to nineteenth-century
architecture; rather they represent a serious diminution of authenticity
in the great monuments of the past subjected to his ministrations. These
include most notably Notre-Dame in Paris, the refurbishing of which he
continued alone after the death of Lassus in 1857, and the Château de
Pierrefonds, Oise, the rebuilding of which began the next year and
continued down to his death in 1879; but the whole list is very long
indeed, including Carcassonne, Vézelay, and Saint-Denis, to mention only
some of the best known things.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account