~Place of the Play in the Elizabethan Drama.~ _Arden of Faversham_ is the finest extant specimen of a kind of play which has been classified as Domestic Tragedy. A picturesque or sensational murder in the sixteenth century was given to the public first in popular ballads or pamphlets, and afterwards, if sufficiently notable, in the more serious Chronicle. From the popular pamphlet, or from the Chronicle, or from both together, it found its way on to the stage. Four of these ‘murder-plays’ have come down to us, and the titles of many others. They form a minor section of the Chronicle plays or Histories. They did not attain any very striking literary development, owing perhaps to the necessary bondage of the poet to his facts. _Arden of Faversham_ is a remarkable instance of the possibilities of this class of play, but it is to be noted that the poet used the narrative of a Chronicler who wrote twenty-seven years after the date of the murder. _A Warning for Fair Women_ and Yarington’s _Two Tragedies in One_ are both inferior to _Arden_, though influenced by it. The fourth ‘murder-play’--_The Yorkshire Tragedy_--is distinct from the other three in style and method. Several famous dramatists produced ‘domestic’ tragedies, but none have survived. _A Late Murder of the Son upon the Mother_, in which Ford and Webster collaborated, must have been a notable piece of work. ~Source of the Play.~ On Sunday, 15th February 1550-1, Thomas Ardern of Faversham, gentleman, ‘was heynously murdered in his own parlour, about seven of the clock in the night, by one Thomas Morsby, a taylor of London, late servant to sir Edward North, knight, chancellor of the augmentations, father-in-law unto Alice Ardern, wife of the said Thomas Ardern.’ Thomas Ardern was Mayor of Faversham in 1548, and his murder made such a stir that in 1577 the first edition of Holinshed’s _Chronicle_ devotes five pages (pp. 1703-8) to an elaborate account of it. The chronicler begins thus:--‘About this time there was at Faversham in Kent a Gentleman named Arden most cruelly murthered and slain by the procurement of his own wife. The which murder for the horribleness thereof, although otherwise it may seem to be but a private matter, and therefore as it were impertinent to this History, I have thought good to set it forth somewhat at large, having the instructions delivered to me by them that have used some diligence to gather the true understanding of the circumstances.’ Our first quotation was from the _Wardmote Book of Faversham_, and proves that Holinshed’s narrative is not minutely accurate. The _Wardmote Book_ gives a curt account of the actual murder on the Sunday evening with the names and fate of the culprits. It tells us nothing of the previous failures of these culprits which give to Holinshed’s tale such a terrible and dramatic interest. We need not speculate on Holinshed’s sources. No doubt there were many contemporary pamphlets and ballads which recounted the murder.