Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. REMICH. They would have to come here and dig out the records if
they wanted to find out about that. The only argument that I have
heard in favor of this suggestion is that it will diminish the amount
of work that will have to be done in the copyright office. If they can
make one certificate cover twenty views or twenty-five views or a
hundred views, they will not have to make so many certificates. Is
there any good reason why my business should be ruined to accomplish
such a result when there are plenty of people that want to work in the
office and when the present revenues are amply sufficient to pay for
all the work done? In my town we are exempting property from taxation
and offering big financial inducements to bring manufacturing
interests into our town, because they are going to employ more labor.
I do not suppose Washington has reached the point where it has so much
population that it does not want more men and women employed in
Washington, performing honest day labor and earning good money to be
expended in the city.
Senator MALLORY. What is the reason assigned for uniting these two
fees in one; do you know?
Mr. REMICH. I was not here, and I did not hear the reasons.
Senator MALLORY. I was not here, either, so I do not know.
Mr. PUTNAM. For the benefit of the Senator I might explain that the
idea was this, Senator: That the office will hereafter furnish the
certificate in all cases as a matter of course, which heretofore has
been furnished only when requested; and that in furnishing it it
should charge for it as heretofore, making the charge therefor $1.
Senator MALLORY. Still, the certificate is not necessary except where
it is desired to prove the fact that the copyright has been secured.
Mr. PUTNAM. It was with the idea that it was a precaution that the
copyright proprietor ought in reason to take.
Senator MALLORY. I have no doubt that there are many persons situated
as this gentleman is who do not want any certificate except in very
rare cases.
Mr. REMICH. That is right.
The CHAIRMAN. To what extent do you now issue certificates?
Mr. PUTNAM. Mr. Register, to what extent is that done?
Mr. SOLBERG. For last year the total of registrations numbered
116,000, and of those 28,087 were certificates.
Mr. REMICH. That is about one-fifth.
Mr. SOLBERG. It should be remembered that requests for certificates
additional to the certificate paid for at the time of registration are
constant, and in addition to fees submitted to secure certificates,
constant inquiry is made of the Copyright Office and answered at some
service cost as to what entries have been made by particular firms.
They ask us "just what entries did we make in May last?"
The CHAIRMAN. What were the gross receipts of the Copyright Office for
the last fiscal year?
Mr. SOLBERG. The receipts--this is for the calendar year, Senator,
those being the latest figures which I have.
The CHAIRMAN. Very well.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account