Mr. REMICH. No. In selling we do this: We have a pictorial illustration of the Holy Land. It includes perhaps fifty pictures, but it covers the whole of the Holy Land. One is taken in Jerusalem, one in Jaffa, and one at Damascus, for instance. We should be glad to comply with any law that will protect us and not inject doubts into our business and encourage piracy. Mr. CURRIER. Mr. Webb desires to know if this amendment would take care of your matter: "Insert after 'seal,' in line 6, page 37, the words 'provided only 50 cents shall be charged for each stereoscopic view filed and registered.'" Mr. REMICH. That is all right. And if we want a certificate in our business, we will come and, as the old lady said, "heave down our 50 cents and get it." Mr. PUTNAM. "_Provided_, That in the case of stereoscopic views the certificate should not be furnished unless required, and in that case the fee shall be," etc. Mr. CURRIER. And in such case no certificate shall be issued unless the regular fee is paid. Mr. REMICH. That is perfectly satisfactory; but any attempt to define by series is sure to be unsatisfactory. Mr. CURRIER. I think you may be right about this matter of series. STATEMENT OF A. BELL MALCOMSON, ESQ. Mr. MALCOMSON. I intend, Mr. Chairman, to be brief. The remarks that I shall make are pertinent more to correct the law so as to make it more definite than for any other purpose. I have prepared a short statement of just what the changes I propose are. The matter is one relating to lithographs. I represent Mr. McLaughlin, or McLaughlin Brothers, who are probably the largest lithographers in the country. Mr. McLaughlin has spent millions in perfecting that art in this country. He, unfortunately, is abroad at the present time, and has asked me to be here to represent him. Lithographs have always been mentioned in the former copyright bills. A lithograph is something different from any other production of a picture or of any pictorial illustration. But in this case it has been thought by the framers of the bill that the words "print or pictorial illustration" would cover lithographs. The CHAIRMAN. Please refer to the section of the bill that you wish to call attention to. Mr. MALCOMSON. I am referring to page 4, line 4. Mr. CHANEY. "Prints and pictorial illustrations?" Mr. MALCOMSON. Yes. The word "lithograph" is not mentioned in the subjects of copyright. It has always heretofore been mentioned. The suggestion that I find in the little memorandum that was attached in relation to the bill is: "It is assumed, however, that these will be included under the more general terms as prints and pictorial illustrations;" that is, that lithographs, it is presumed by the framers of this bill, will be included under that term.