Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. PUTNAM. If the words "only in pose or composition" were stricken
out, would there be a material reduction in your fees? In the first
place, it seems to me that it would be convenient for us to know--how
many copyright entries do you make in the course of a year?
Mr. REMICH. I can not tell.
Mr. PUTNAM. Have you any idea?
Mr. REMICH. It varies with different years.
Mr. PUTNAM. Would it run up into thousands?
Mr. REMICH. Some years I think it does.
Mr. PUTNAM. If you were privileged to register under one fee works in
a series----
Mr. REMICH. But what would be a "series?" That is the question.
Mr. CURRIER. Representing the same subject.
Mr. PUTNAM. Representing the same subject under the same title with
only slight variances, but not the variances described here as "only
in pose or composition." What we would like to know is, would it
enable you to enter a great many of these articles under one fee that
you now enter separately?
Mr. REMICH. That depends upon what you call the same subject.
Mr. CURRIER. Is seems to me that you would have to introduce the word
"general;" that is, make it read "the same general subject."
Mr. REMICH. If you introduce that who will decide what is the same
general subject, except the courts? It would encourage law suits.
The CHAIRMAN. It would be the Librarian, would it not?
Mr. REMICH. His decision would not be final. The law says we can go to
the courts and test his construction.
The CHAIRMAN. It would be the Librarian, so far as your fees were
concerned?
Mr. REMICH. Yes; but we do not want to pay a fee unless it is to be
registered in such a way that the court will hold that we have a legal
registration. We have an artist in San Francisco; and if we could
register under one entry all the views that he will take in San
Francisco while he is there, which will probably be 500 different
subjects, for half a dollar, we would like to do it. But what subjects
that he takes in San Francisco can we include as a series and have
protected? He will take the Pacific Hotel, showing its ruin and
present condition, and he may take a Chinese camp, and he may take the
Flood Building, and so on. How many can we get into a series and have
the court protect us when we come to try a case? That is the
difficulty.
Suppose this said you shall enter under a series all churches in
Paris--under one entry fee, for 50 cents--that we may enter all
negatives that we take of churches there. How will you describe it in
your entry upon the book? Suppose we go to Rome, where they have 365
Catholic churches; they are not grouped in any way; we can not pose
them. How will you describe the 365 views? Will you describe them as
365 views of the churches of Rome, or will you specify them under one
head? You can see the difficulties, gentlemen.
Mr. PUTNAM. Do you not publish those in series for selling purposes
sometimes?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account