Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
As president of Local No. 4, of Bookbinders' Union, of this city,
and representative of the International Brotherhood of Bookbinders
of the United States, I would be pleased to be heard on the Currier
copyright bill to-morrow, immediately after Mr. J. J. Sullivan has
spoken on bill. I will not consume more than ten minutes, and
possibly less than that. I will be in attendance at the hearing.
Very respectfully,
J. L. FEENEY.
The office has received, since the bill was introduced, from the Music
Publishers' Association, certain proposed amendments, additional
provisions in connection with the protection of the copyright on
musical compositions. These, I should advise the chairman, have not
been communicated to the gentlemen who are to speak in opposition to
any of those provisions. They have not had them, therefore, before
them in preparing their case this morning at all; and while I have
manifolded copies here which are at their disposal, it is to be
understood that these were not communicated to them. On the other
hand, Mr. Serven, who in behalf of the music publishers handed these
to me, states (if I am not correct, Mr. Serven, you will correct me)
that these contain additional specifications but in the same general
direction. That is all.
Mr. A. R. SERVEN. That is correct, Mr. Librarian, and simply to
conform subsection G of section 1 to comply with the recent decision
of the United States circuit court of appeals in the White-Smith _v._
Apollo Company case. The same idea is represented simply. The case was
decided, of course, since the bill was printed.
The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Putnam, just call our attention to the proposed
change.
Mr. PUTNAM. This is contained in a written communication, and it will
really take less time to read it from the communication.
The CHAIRMAN. Yes.
Mr. PUTNAM. (Reading:)
Section 1, subsection G, should be amended to read as follows:
"To make, sell, distribute, or let for hire any device,
contrivance, or appliance adapted in any manner whatsoever when
used in connection with any mechanism to reproduce to the ear or
to cause the said mechanism to reproduce to the ear the sounds
forming or identifying the whole or any material part of any work
copyrighted after this act shall have gone into effect, or by
means of any such device, contrivance, appliance, or mechanism
publicly to reproduce to the ear the whole or any material part of
such work."
Omitting the explanations, the next amendment will be as follows:
Section 3 should be amended to read as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account