"That the copyright provided by this act shall extend to and protect all the copyrightable component parts of the work copyrighted, any and all reproductions or copies thereof, in whatever form, style, or size, and all matter reproduced therein in which copyright is already subsisting, and the devices, appliances, or contrivances mentioned in section 1, subdivision (_g_) of this act, but without extending the duration of such copyright." Section 23, subdivision (_b_)---- The CHAIRMAN. I suppose the other amendments are simply to follow if the first amendment is approved? Mr. PUTNAM. If the first amendment is approved; that is my understanding. Mr. SERVEN. Mr. Chairman, that is true with the exception of one amendment. The Musical Publishers' Association suggests that the same right of appeal and review in interlocutory judgments and orders should be provided for in the new bill as is provided for in the existing law. That is the only thing that is different. Mr. HORACE PETTIT. Mr. Chairman, may I ask Mr. Serven whether he will add to his amended section 3 the clause which I suggested in my amendment to the original section 3? It would accomplish the same purpose as I had intended. My suggestion of amendment would also apply to your amended section 3, which adds: _And provided_, That no devices, contrivances, or appliances, or dies or matrices for making the same, made prior to the date this act shall go into effect, shall be subject to any subsisting copyright. Mr. SERVEN, Yes, Mr. Chairman; I think that is only fair to the interests represented. Mr. PETTIT. You accept that as an addition to your amendment? Mr. SERVEN. We are very glad to, indeed. We think that is perfectly fair. Mr. CURRIER. A suggestion was made here the other day, the first day of the hearings, to strike out section 3, I think. M. PETTIT. Well, either that or that my amendment be added to it. Mr. CURRIER. Yes. Who was the gentleman who replied to you. Mr. PETTIT. Mr. Fuller, of New York. Mr. CURRIER. I understood Mr. Fuller to say that the question of whether subsisting copyrights covered these mechanical devices was now in the court, and they thought the court might hold that such devices were now covered. If such should be the decision of the court, would it not prohibit the use of graphophone cylinders and records already made and in use, if they were records of music covered by a subsisting copyright, under that section 3? Mr. PETTIT. If the decision of the court were such as to include talking-machine records or other sound records within the subsisting law, of course it would prohibit that. Mr. CURRIER. Does any gentleman here think we ought to legislate along that line? Mr. PETTIT. Not that I know of. I do not understand that they think so, unless Mr. Fuller was misunderstood.