Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
To anybody reading the provisions of this bill it would appear very
clearly that one of the great special interests were the manufacturers
of perforated music rolls. Proceed a little further and it will be
very apparent that the manufacturers of automatic piano-playing
instruments, which can not be operated without music rolls, had a very
special interest in this bill. It would be the easiest thing in
creation to notify the manufacturers of music rolls and the
manufacturers of automatic piano players of these conferences. Take up
any directory of manufacturers in the United States and you would find
them by the dozen.
The CHAIRMAN. Let me interrupt you for a moment, Mr. O'Connell, to say
that so far as I myself am concerned it does not seem necessary to
continue longer upon that line, for the reason that the committees of
the Senate and House are now giving you a hearing, and you shall have
an ample opportunity to present your side of the case.
Mr. O'CONNELL. I simply wanted to make it clear to the whole
committee, as I explained it to the chairman yesterday, that it was
only last Saturday that we knew what the situation was and knew what
the provisions of this bill were.
I might say at the outset that the companies which I represent are not
members of that class which Mr. Putnam so delicately denominated as
pirates. We are here to protect industries in which there are invested
millions of dollars. It has also been said by some of these special
interests which are appearing in favor of the bill, in elegant
language, that we were "butters-in" at the eleventh hour, and that we
are here for the purpose of a hold-up. If protecting our business
makes us butters-in and hold-up artists, then we come under that
definition.
I want to say furthermore, at the outset, that we have no particular
controversy or quarrel with those very eminent gentlemen, Mr. Herbert
and Mr. Sousa. It is perfectly proper for them to seek to get all they
possibly can from the products of their genius, but we are all a great
deal too sentimentally inclined toward them and their possessions
because of the many hours of delight they have given to every one of
us.
Here is our position, and I will try to outline it as briefly as I
possibly can: A number of years ago in the city of New York, within
the last decade, a number of gentlemen interested in a manufacturing
concern, one of the pioneers in the piano-playing industry, had the
foresight to realize that the industry was destined to become one in
which there were millions of dollars of profit, followed the
conclusion that they would like to get for themselves all of the
millions in that particular industry. The question was how to achieve
and attain that result. Naturally they turned to the patent laws, to
get monopolies under patents covering not only the machines
themselves, but also the music rolls, without which the machines could
not be operated, and machinery for cutting such music rolls.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account