Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. SOUSA. I would like to say, Mr. Chairman, that I have never been
approached by any of the mechanical instrument companies; and the
house which I have a contract with, the publishing house, is not a
member of the Music Publishers' Association. I have never even been
approached by any of them, and I have no contract with anyone.
The CHAIRMAN. We will hear you now, Mr. O'Connell.
Mr. PUTNAM. Mr. Chairman, for the group of interests which are now to
be heard I wish to make a statement that they might feel called upon
or required to make, but which it is not fair should be taken out of
their time. They were not participants in the conferences. How
completely they were omitted is apparent only from the list. That list
is before you. It will take but a moment to read the titles of these
associations: American Authors' Copyright League, National
Institute----
Senator SMOOT. We know them.
The CHAIRMAN. They are already in the record. They have been laid
before us.
Mr. PUTNAM. They were not participants in the conferences. They were
not invited to the conferences by the copyright office. There were no
notices sent to them from the copyright office that the conferences
were being held; that these provisions were being considered at them.
The copyright office shows, so far as I am aware, no communication
with them on the subject of any of these provisions. We have never,
ourselves, in any way notified them that these provisions were being
proposed for the bill. I say that as much because it is to their
advantage that I should say it as for them to say it, and it is not
fair that that statement should have to be made at the expense of
their time.
STATEMENT OF JOHN J. O'CONNELL.
Mr. O'CONNELL. We intended to make that statement ourselves.
The CHAIRMAN. Whom do you represent?
Mr. O'CONNELL. I appear on behalf of ten independent manufacturers of
automatic piano players in the city of New York, and the names of
these concerns are as follows: Winter & Co., Ludwig & Co., Jacob Doll
& Sons, Laffargue & Co., John Ludwig, the Regal Piano and Player
Company, Ricca & Son, the Auto-Electric Piano Company, Newby & Evans,
and the Estey Piano Company.
I also appear on behalf, by arrangement here, of independent
manufacturers of music rolls. I can also say that possibly what I
shall have to say to your committee will represent the ideas of the
various independent manufacturers of automatic piano players in the
United States and the various independent manufacturers of perforated
music rolls.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account