Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
In section 1, subdivision C, provision is made for the protection
of an "oral delivery" which has been prepared. Would it not be
well to specifically allow a speaker to announce at the conclusion
of an extemporaneous address his intention of copyrighting it, not
permitting this announcement, however, to interfere with the
liberty of the press in reporting portions of it?
Section 9 directs that notice of copyright shall be given at each
public delivery of a lecture or similar work. Does "similar work"
include dramatic composition? Is the proposed notice to be given
orally, or by publication on a programme, if there is a programme?
It would seem that in the case of a dramatic composition
theatrical managers should be compelled by law to print on each
programme copyright notice of the play or plays produced, being
allowed, where there is no programme, to announce it orally.
It would also seem important that in the case of a dramatic
composition publicly acted in foreign countries notice of
copyright in the United States, together with legal title of the
work in English, be printed on the programmes, as well as on the
manuscript copies of the play. This would serve as a notice
against translators, who otherwise would have great difficulty in
finding out whether a foreign play had been copyrighted here,
since the name of the play or its English equivalent rather, would
be very uncertain. Does the new law specifically require all
titles to be also in English?
Does the law provide for the registration of the title in advance
of the deposit of copies as at present--a valuable privilege?
Section 20 seems calculated to work an injustice to novelists.
That the author's exclusive right to dramatize his copyrighted
work should cease in the event of his being unable within ten
years to induce managers to produce his dramatization would be
unfair--would, in fact, encourage producers to wait until after
ten years before producing a dramatization of a novel. Would it
not be sufficient to state that the exclusive right terminates at
the end of ten years provided the author does not file at least an
unpublished dramatized version?
Does this section 20 mean that a foreign dramatist who deposits an
unpublished and untranslated copy of a dramatic composition loses
his rights if his play is not produced publicly in ten years, or
does it allow him to deposit a translated unpublished copy any
time within ten years, in order to protect his rights?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account