Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. Thomae represented that his interests might in one aspect be
affirmative also and asked to hear the discussion. He was permitted
to. He was not invited; he did not participate; he uttered not a word
in the course of the entire proceedings. But he asked to come and
listen, and he was permitted to. On the list of the few others present
as observers you will find the name of Gen. Eugene Griffin. General
Griffin came to us in March saying that he understood some such
provisions as these were under consideration; he had some interest in
a concern which would be affected; could he attend the conference and
hear what was proposed? Certainly. And he did. Mr. Thomae was to us
but the maker of a particular typical device. With Mr. Thomae as a
competitor among you we had no concern. What device or company General
Griffin was interested in we did not know and I do not know to this
day. But we took care to insert the names of both gentlemen on the
printed list of those present, so that you and others might be free to
make such inference as you chose from the fact of their presence. And
this list was furnished freely to all requesting it.
These conferences have been going on for a year past. The fact that
they were being held, their purpose, and the associations
participating in them was freely published. Among these associations
were the composers and the music publishers. In the Apollo suit then
pending they were trying to secure protection of this sort under
existing law. There was every reason to suppose that they would urge
it in the new statute. Did any of you ever inquire of us whether they
were doing so? As long ago as last December the President announced to
Congress, and in the most public way to the country, that the bill had
already been prepared. Did you ask us for it? Did you even ask whether
such a bill would be likely to include any such provisions? As long
ago as January the music trade journals began to refer to the fact
that it would do so. Did you then ask leave to come to the next
conference? Did you ask even as to the character of the provisions?
Did you communicate with the Copyright Office in any way in the
matter? You know you did not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account