Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
The fact that you did not is not to prejudice you in any way, and the
fact that you did not participate in the conferences I have myself
emphasized to the committee to your advantage, pointing out that these
provisions had been inserted without discussion at the conferences by
any interest naturally adverse to them. The fact is to your advantage.
I earnestly suggest that you avoid giving it a twist such as Mr.
Cameron gave it yesterday; I mean by such expression as "star chamber
proceedings." We can't let such imputations against the Government
stand uncorrected. But we hate to have to divert attention from the
main issue in order to correct them. The main issue is the merit of
these provisions. We are as anxious as is the committee to know your
substantial objections to them. And our interest is absolutely
identical with that of the committee in seeing that the objections you
show shall have due value and effect.
(The following letter was subsequently written by Mr. Putnam, and by
direction of the chairman made part of the record:)
JUNE 16, 1906.
Messrs. CHAIRMEN: In my remarks to the representatives of the
talking machine and perforated roll interests at the hearing of
June 9 I stated that Mr. Thomae had not been "invited" to the
conferences. Of course he was invited or he could not have
attended. What I meant was that he was not among those originally
invited or in our list of those naturally entitled to be present.
I had thought the distinction sufficiently clear from the context;
but I find that it was not.
The chief purpose of my reference to him and to General Griffin
was not, of course, to excuse or explain their presence, but to
indicate how readily access to the conference could be secured by
a request to the copyright office.
Very respectfully,
HERBERT PUTNAM,
_Librarian of Congress_.
The CHAIRMEN OF THE COMMITTEES ON PATENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE
AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
Mr. CURRIER. I wish to say that last winter some time Mr. Griffin, who
is interested in one of the perforated-roll concerns, called at the
committee room and talked about this matter, and I advised him at that
time to see Mr. Solberg and Mr. Putnam. The committee clerk has had
some correspondence with him since that time, and other gentlemen
connected with that same business, I suppose, have been into the
committee room to make inquiries regarding this matter pretty nearly
every week for months.
Mr. CAMERON. I would like to say that I do not even know who Mr.
Griffin is.
Mr. CURRIER. He is the vice-president of the General Electric Company.
I think he lives in Brooklyn and is connected with some
perforated-roll company.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account