Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. — John Shaqi
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
It may be said that the public was not represented at the conferences.
The public in this matter would, I suppose, belong to one of four
classes: In the first place, the producer, the creator, with his
publisher and manufacturer; or, second, one who is to enjoy the work as
a consumer; or, third, one who wishes to utilize the work in some other
work, or to reproduce and market it for his own benefit, when this can
be done innocently; or, fourth, the student and critic of the rights
and obligations of property, and of the regulation of this by law.
There may be a fifth class, the mere pirate. He was not invited to the
conferences, and I suppose he would not be to your hearings. But the
innocent reproducer was not unrepresented at the conferences or in the
discussions. In fact, most of the producers were also reproducers, and
quite insistent upon their convenience as such. The original producers,
publishers, and manufacturers were there as of right, and the student
and critic through their interest and public spirit. As for the
consumers, two considerable groups were actually represented, and more
would have been if organizations could have been found to represent
them. Others also there spoke for them.
But as I understand it, it is in the interest of the consumer just
because it is in the interest of the producer that copyright laws were
originally designed and were called for by the Constitution; and if
this proposed one fails fairly to regard that interest of the consumer,
its defects will surely be brought to your attention by the third great
estate which is jealous of those interests--the newspaper and
periodical press; for the bill is now before the public.
Finally, Mr. Chairman, notwithstanding the labor put upon it, the bill
is doubtless still imperfect in expressing its intentions; and I have
no doubt that while it is under consideration those especially
concerned will ask leave to submit to you some amendments of
phraseology. I understand that any such amendments proposed by
participants in the conferences will be communicated first to the
copyright office, so that they may be formulated by the register for
your convenient consideration; and the office will gladly do the same
for any that may reach it from any other source.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account