Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. WALKER. No; I would take it out altogether, and leave it as in
patent cases--that only originals are entitled to be recorded. Such a
thing as allowing a copy of an assignment of a patent or a copyright
to be recorded in the place of the original is entirely unknown, and
it would open the door widely to fraud.
The CHAIRMAN. Your time has expired, Mr. Walker.
Mr. WALKER. Yes. I wish to express my thanks to the committee for
hearing me so long and so patiently, and to express my best wishes for
the future of the bill, and my own entire willingness to contribute,
if I am found to be competent to contribute, to the perfection of the
bill hereafter.
Senator SMOOT. Mr. Walker, I have been wondering, for the hour that
you have been delivering your intelligent speech here, on what basis
your congratulations were extended to Mr. Putnam and other persons who
took part in the preparation of this bill. [Laughter.]
Mr. WALKER. Why, I am surprised that you did not see that.
Mr. PUTNAM. I can say, Senator, It is because they have had the
benefit of such lucid criticism at such an early stage. I can say that
it was not expected by us that anyone would take up this bill with
such a penetrating intelligence as Mr. Walker has shown, within a week
after its introduction into Congress.
Mr. WALKER. And I wish to say to the Senator from Utah, if I may be
permitted, that while I have criticized this bill in plain terms, the
framework of the bill as a whole is very scientific, and in one day or
two days I could so amend the bill as to entirely remove all my
objections and still preserve the substance of the scheme which Mr.
Putnam has put upon paper.
Senator SMOOT. I have been very much interested, Mr. Walker, in your
statement.
Mr. SULZER. Mr. Chairman, I agree with the Senator from Utah; I have
been very much interested in what Mr. Walker has said, and I was going
to make this suggestion: That he be allowed to file a brief with the
committee, which will be printed in the record as a part of the
record.
The CHAIRMAN. That was understood the other day.
Mr. WALKER. Thank you very much.
Mr. SULZER. Mr. Chairman, I would be glad to have the committee hear
now Mr. Nathan Burkan, who represents the publishers and composers of
music.
Mr. CURRIER. Mr. Sulzer, two gentlemen who are now present have come
all the way from Chicago to address the committee and have just this
moment gotten here.
The CHAIRMAN. We will hear Mr. Burkan after them.
Mr. CURRIER. We will hear him later.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account