Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. — John Shaqi
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. PUTNAM. Yes; and as I was saying, Mr. Currier, we have already note
of that protest. Mr. Cutter, Doctor Steiner, and perhaps
others--certainly those two, however--Mr. Cutter being librarian of the
Forbes Library, at Northampton, and Doctor Steiner being librarian of
the Enoch Pratt Library, at Baltimore, are here in behalf of
remonstrants against any diminution of the present privileges of
libraries. I had understood that this provision as it stands had been
accepted by the representatives of the association simply as
participants in the conference. May Mr. Bostwick state as to that, Mr.
Chairman? I only suggest it because you asked the question.
The CHAIRMAN. We have concluded that it is best to adopt the suggestion
to hear first the proponents of the bill and then, at a later period,
hear those who object to its provisions.
Mr. PUTNAM. In that case, Mr. Chairman, if you will let me suggest, the
interests represented at the conference are easily classifiable. They
were the creators of literary productions, the authors; they were the
dramatists; they were the composers and the publishers of those
productions, the manufacturers, the reproducers; they were these two
associations, so far as we had them there, representing the consumers;
and then there were the two committees of the American Bar Association
representing our general legal advisers.
Mr. Bowker is here representing the author class particularly.
The CHAIRMAN. We will hear from Mr. Bowker.
Mr. SULZER. Mr. Chairman, I would like to have it noted on the record
that I have received a letter from former Judge A. J. Dittenhoefer, the
well-known lawyer of New York City, who represents the American
Dramatists' Club and the Managers' Association, of New York, and who
desires to appear at some subsequent time in favor of certain
provisions in this proposed law.
The CHAIRMAN. Does he desire to be heard if the committee is in favor
of them?
Mr. SULZER. No; not if the committee is in favor of them. That is the
point.
The CHAIRMAN. Perhaps that can be taken up, then, at a later date.
Mr. SULZER. Yes.
STATEMENT OF RICHARD ROGERS BOWKER, ESQ., VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE
AMERICAN COPYRIGHT LEAGUE.
The CHAIRMAN. Will you please state your name, Mr. Bowker, your
residence, and whom you represent?
Mr. BOWKER. My name is Richard Rogers Bowker. I speak as vice-president
of the American Copyright League, commonly called the Authors'
Copyright League.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account