Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
_8. As to right of translation._--The present bill makes a radical
departure from the present statute in respect to the right of
translation of a copyrighted work into other languages. Under the
present statute, as above noted and presented in the brief cited,
the right of translation inheres in the author as author,
conditioned only upon copyright having been obtained of his
original work, but not conditioned upon that copyright remaining
in him. His assignment of the original copyright does not carry to
the purchaser, or divest from the author, the right of
translation. The translation, when made by the author, is his own
product. He may copyright it or not as he pleases; but the owner
of the original copyright has no right in the translation unless
expressly conveyed to him (which may be done, of course, by
express mention in the conveyance of the original copyright, or by
the transference of the manuscript of the original work before
copyright, putting the purchaser in the position fully of the
author as to all the rights arising out of authorship).
The present bill, however, makes the right of translation not
merely one which is conditioned upon the existence of copyright of
the original work, but an essential and integral part of that
copyright, so that it will pass with the assignment of the
copyright without special mention, and the proprietor of the
copyright, and not the author, would thereafter have the right of
translation. The author could not translate his own work without
infringing the copyright which he had sold to the proprietor. Any
translation, however maladroit or misleading, which the copyright
owner--publisher--might approve would pass under the author's name
as his work into the foreign language, and he would have no voice
to protest against the libel, no power to remedy the injury by
putting out a correct translation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account