Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
It can not be doubted that such considerations as these governed
in the enactment of the present statute in such form that the
right of translation inheres in the author and does not pass
without his express act, though the original copyright may have
been assigned. It is obvious that the author ought to have a right
in respect to translation which will not require express
reservation in order to remain his own when he sells his
copyright. It will be apparent that negotiations between an author
and publisher for the sale of his copyright will commonly proceed
in general terms, referring to the copyright by that term, and
that the author will commonly be considering only what may be
termed the original copyright in such negotiations, and that he
will in some instances convey the copyright with no thought of the
appurtenant rights involved in it, and will wake up only too late
to find that he has no control over translation, if the term
"copyright" carries the whole right, including that of
translation, as the present bill provides.
The statute is right as it stands and the bill should be amended
to conform to the present statute in this respect.
I have drafted amendments to the various sections and paragraphs
of the bill such as are necessary, in my judgment, to make it
conform with the requirements of equity to the different interests
affected, and with sound public policy, in the various respects
above pointed out and discussed, and would submit them herewith,
but find that they are so numerous and require insertions and
emendations at so many points in the bill that I believe the
purposes of the committee will be much better served by the
submission a little later of a full draft of a bill embodying the
various changes which I would suggest, so that the matter may be
considered in a form consistent throughout instead of in the
piecemeal form which would result from the many amendments which
would be required to put the present bill in desirable form.
Such completely framed bill I promise to submit to the committee
at an early day and in ample time for full consideration upon the
reassembling of the committee in the fall.
Thanking the committee for the opportunity which has been afforded
me for presenting my views in the interest of my client, I am,
Respectfully,
CHAS. S. BURTON,
_Representing Melville Clark Piano Company_.
STATEMENT OF NATHAN BURKAN, ESQ., OF NEW YORK CITY.
Mr. BURKAN. Gentlemen, there has been a great deal said here about
this "monopoly," this great "music trust," that intends to----
Mr. CHANEY. You are a publisher, are you?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account