Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. PUTNAM. I have information, Mr. Chairman, that when the matter of
the reproduction of music by mechanical devices comes up for
discussion, Mr. John J. O'Connell, an attorney of New York, would like
to be heard, representing ten manufacturers of automatic piano players
in New York City, and desiring to be heard only in opposition to those
portions of the bill respecting musical copyrights, and that in
connection with the same general subject-matter Mr. Howlett Davis, an
inventor of material that enters into these devices, desires an
opportunity to make some opening remarks, pointing out how the
proposed bill will, if enacted, act in restraint of invention, and
show how it encroaches upon the existing patent laws.
If it is your pleasure, now, Mr. Chairman, I would suggest that it
would be helpful to have an expression from the librarians dissenting
from the assent of the American Library Association with regard to the
importation clause, while Colonel Olin's remarks are fresh in mind,
and if that is your pleasure, I think it is only fair that I should
make clear the status of that provision.
The list of participants in the conference included two associations
that might be interested or were certain to be interested in these
importation provisions. One was the National Educational Association
and the other the American Library Association. These importation
clauses concededly contain a restriction, a limitation, a diminution
of existing privileges of importations enjoyed by individuals and
enjoyed by certain institutions.
The National Educational Association might well have spoken for both
individuals and institutions and generally. As a matter of fact, it
should be clear that the participation of the National Educational
Association in the conferences was of the slightest. They were
invited, we urged them to be represented, and they were present by
delegate at the first and the second conferences; but their
participation was of the slightest. There was no expression from them
upon the diminution in the case of individuals, and they contented
themselves at the outset with an expression of dissent from any
provisions which tended to diminish in any way the present privileges
of libraries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account