Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
The American Library Association was present by two accredited
delegates, who considered, by later action of the representative board
of the association, that they had authority to represent the
association in assenting to final provisions. Those two delegates were
the present president of the American Library Association, Mr. Frank
P. Hill, of the Brooklyn Public Library, and Mr. Frank C. Bostwick, of
the New York Public Library. Mr. Bostwick was here yesterday, but has
had to leave to-day. Colonel Olin's remarks included the American
Library Association as one of those associations for whom he could
give a general assent to the bill substantially as it stood. Coupled
with that, however, should, I think, be before you this entry in the
record of our conference in March last. At that conference these
provisions were, I believe, substantially (as far as they regarded
libraries) as they stand in the bill, except that one proviso has been
added, which is rather in favor of libraries, as we understand it,
than otherwise. They expressed themselves then thus:
Mr. HILL. There is very little that I need to say. The
paragraph relating to the copyright respecting the libraries has
been taken up very carefully by the executive board and the council
and by the delegates, and we are satisfied as an association with
the draft as submitted, and, personally, I approve of the change
which has been agreed to this morning between the publishers and
the delegates. That related to the additional proviso that they
should not be prohibited from importing foreign editions in these
exceptional cases, where they could not get the American edition.
I think it is only fair to state, Mr. Librarian, that while the
executive board and the council of the American Library Association
have both voted for the adoption of this draft there will be
individual opposition. There are some librarians and some libraries
that are opposed to any change in any part of the law which affects
importation, and so have reserved the right to oppose that part of
the bill. I think it is due to you that such statement may be made,
so that you may know the individual opinion as well as the general
one.
If Mr. Bostwick had been here, he would to-day have called attention to
that. I do it simply because those delegates are not here to say that;
and I do it in order to give Mr. Cutter's remarks a proper standing
before you. Mr. Cutter, as I understand it, represents librarians and
libraries who object to any diminution of the present privileges.
(The papers referred to during the foregoing statement by Mr. Putnam
are as follows:)
THE NEW WILLARD,
_Washington, D.C., June 7, 1906_.
_To the honorable Joint Committee of the Senate and House of
Representatives._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account