Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. PIRIE MACDONALD. We wish to stand for the word "accessible" as it
has been evolved by the Librarian, and we would wish that in case the
word "uncovered" is used it be very strictly defined; that it be
defined as to when this picture should be uncovered. If, for
example--and remember, please, that I am speaking merely for
photographers, and not as a reproductionist--suppose I were to make a
photograph of someone, and were to properly and duly mark it with the
notice as prescribed by law (for example, a photograph of yourself),
and you were to decide that you objected to the notice as being a
defacement, and you were to take it on yourself not to take the notice
from the picture (because that would be prevented by the proposed law)
but to cover it up. It is your property, unquestionably; and it gets
to the hand of a reproducer and he says, "This is not uncovered."
Therefore I suggest that in case by any chance the word "uncovered" is
used, it be very strictly defined.
Mr. PUTNAM. Mr. Chairman, there are a great many people here who are
interested in behalf of the provisions in the bill proposing
protection against the mechanical devices for the reproduction of
music to the ear. There are many here who are opposed to the
provisions of the bill, and those who are its proponents are in favor
of them. They are, of course, very desirous to near the arguments
advanced by those who are against them, and, if it be your pleasure, I
would suggest that it would be only fair to hear from the opponents of
those provisions as soon as possible. I have called as many as I knew
of the participants in the conference who cared to say anything at
this stage in favor of the bill. One additional participant to those
who have spoken, representing the directory publishers--I think that
association is not here--states, in a letter:
I take this opportunity to say that our association fully indorses
the bill as presented to Congress, with the single exception of the
final paragraph of section 13.
That is the paragraph requiring that in the affidavit as to
manufacture the place in which the work was done and the establishment
shall be specified. I simply ask that that go into the record as
coming from the American Directory Publishers.
The CHAIRMAN. What reason is given for that request?
Mr. PUTNAM. I understand the reason to be that it would be an undue
burden upon the publishers.
The CHAIRMAN. In what respect?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account