Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
The CHAIRMAN (after further consultation with the other members of the
committee). We will hear you, Mr. Walker, one hour to-morrow morning,
if we are unable to reach you to-day, with the privilege of submitting
in writing your views if you so desire.
Mr. WALKER. If the chairman will allow me to make the suggestion, if I
were to be heard to-morrow for an hour, that would probably cut off
other gentlemen who would wish to speak much shorter than that, and it
would be very convenient for me, if the committee is to sit at all on
Saturday, to hear other gentlemen on Friday and let me speak on
Saturday.
The CHAIRMAN. If we are compelled to hold a session on Saturday, we
will hear you on that day; but we hope that the gentlemen who are
present to present their views to the committee will finish in such
time as will permit you to have your hour to-morrow morning.
Mr. WALKER. Then, is it understood that I am to speak first to-morrow
morning?
The CHAIRMAN. I think not.
Mr. CURRIER. There are some other gentlemen here who will want five or
ten minutes.
The CHAIRMAN. Inasmuch as you prefer to go over until Saturday, if
convenient to the committee, I should think that the members from out
of town and the other gentlemen here should be first to address the
committee.
Mr. WALKER. That is very agreeable to me.
Mr. SOUSA. I sincerely trust, Mr. Chairman, that in Mr. Walker's
discussion it will not be permitted to discuss the copyright of the
past. We are not after that. We want a copyright of the future. If he
will talk about things that will be for the benefit of the future, I
think you should give him the time; but if he is going into a
discussion of what was done a hundred or two hundred or three hundred
years ago, we do not want it. [Laughter.] That is the past; we want
the future.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account