Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. CROMELIN. Mr. Chairman, I would like to give notice, as the
representative of the Columbia Phonograph Company, representing large
interests which are vitally affected by this bill; as the
representative of a company which knew nothing of this proposed
legislation before the publication took place on the 31st of May; as
the representative of a company that was not invited to take part in
the so-called conferences, notwithstanding the fact that its industry
is so broad that it embraces the world, that I would like to be heard,
and that it will probably take at least one hour or two hours to
present this subject in all of its ramifications to your committee. It
was my understanding that the committee would adjourn to-day at 12 or
1 o'clock, and in view of the fact that the opponents of this measure
have had to come together quickly, and that they have had no time to
organize, while on the other hand those who are proposing it have had
conferences for more than one year, I propose, sir, that it would be
meet and proper at this time to adjourn this conference until
to-morrow morning, giving the opponents of the measure a chance to
decide upon a plan of action for presenting this matter to your
committee, and that we will come here to-morrow morning and present
the various views of those who are interested.
I therefore suggest the advisability of a postponement until to-morrow
morning or an adjournment.
The CHAIRMAN. Do I understand that all the opponents of the provisions
of this law relative to talking-machine devices can be heard within
one hour?
Mr. CROMELIN. No, sir. I speak on behalf of myself, for my own
industry only. There are others----
The CHAIRMAN. How many desire a hearing?
Mr. CROMELIN. I believe that there are at least a half a dozen
gentlemen who desire a hearing.
The CHAIRMAN. Does each want one hour?
Mr. CROMELIN. I do not know how long it will take them to present
their views.
The CHAIRMAN. We established a rule at the beginning of the hearings
yesterday limiting the statements to ten minutes each.
Mr. CROMELIN. I understood, Mr. Chairman, that that was in regard to
the proponents of the measure. I did not understand that you intended
to limit those persons whose interests are vitally affected by this
measure to ten minutes to reply. I do not believe that is the
intention of this committee; and I submit the question to the
honorable chairman.
Mr. CHANEY. Mr. Chairman, it is entirely out of all reason to expect
us to remember what these gentlemen will say. We will want a good deal
of it in typewriting anyhow; and they can simply give a synopsis of an
argument here as to what they want to do, and we must expect them to
submit to the committee in writing for our use such matters as they
seem to think important for our consideration when we are giving the
bill consideration. They do not need so long a time to make a speech
here. Let them prepare their matter and hand it in.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account